Models
Z.ai
GLM-4.5 ARC Benchmark Performance

Z.aiX · Aug 11, 2025 · official

GLM-4.5 ARC Benchmark Performance

Z.ai's benchmark bar chart drew 153.3K views on X: 0.8x its median post and #308 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

GLM-4.5 leads ARC benchmarks with 63.2 average score

XData Benchmark bar chart GLM-4 All Z.ai models o3 Grok 4 Claude Opus 4 Claude Sonnet 4 Gemini 2.5 Pro Kimi K2 GPT-4.1GLM-4.5

Z.ai: GLM-4.5 ARC Benchmark Performance — Published by Z.ai on X, Aug 11, 2025. Source: x.com

74/ 100

ViralChart score

Reached and resonated

More views and a higher engagement rate than the median post: it travelled and people acted on it.

#138 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #13 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Reached and resonated quadrant, at #138 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 0.26% save rate sits at the 95th percentile among AI chart posts, against a 0.076% median.

The score of 74 ranks #138 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #13 of 34 Z.ai posts.

At 0.93 views per follower it reaches the 77th percentile, on 153K views against 165K followers.

top 5%save rate

0.257% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

3.4xthe median benchmark bar chart post

Across 215 benchmark bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 44.4K views.

2posts from Z.ai that day

Part of a run of 2 posts on Aug 11, 2025. This one was #2 of 2 by views that day.

0.8xZ.ai's median post

153.3K views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #138 of 1,162

Views	153.3K	#308	top 26%
Likes	952	#283	top 24%
Engagement rate	0.77%	#544	top 47%
Save rate	0.257%	#58	top 5%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #13 of 34

Views	153.3K	#19	bottom 46%
Likes	952	#19	bottom 46%
Engagement rate	0.77%	#11	top 31%
Save rate	0.257%	#2	top 4%

Growth

Our reads cover 28 hours

Views153.3K

Age at our read429 days

Views per day of life358views divided by days since it was posted

Gained between our reads+0views over 28 hours, about 0 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Aug 11, 2025

Z.ai posts GLM-4.5 ARC benchmark chart

A single benchmark bar chart from Z.ai drew 153K views and a 0.26% save rate, the 95th percentile among AI chart posts.

What happened

Z.ai published a benchmark bar chart on August 11, 2025, covering GLM-4.5 ARC benchmark performance. The account posted 2 items that day, including one on open-source LLMs benchmarks with 300K views.

The numbers

The post reached 153K views, ranking #308 of 1,162 AI chart posts, against a 39.9K median. Its score of 74 ranks #138 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #13 of 34 Z.ai posts.

The lesson

A 0.26% save rate at the 95th percentile among AI chart posts shows what a benchmark bar chart with 13 models can hold: the chart shows o3 at 65 and GLM-4.5 at 63.2.

What it means

At #13 of 34 Z.ai posts, this chart sits inside the account's own range, while its 0.26% save rate clears the 0.076% median among AI chart posts.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

Data and API

56 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 66%

Series	Group	Value	Read
Foundation Models	o3	65	printed
Foundation Models	Grok 4	63.6	printed
Foundation Models	GLM-4.5	63.2	printed
Foundation Models	Claude Opus 4	60.9	printed
Foundation Models	o4-min (high)	60.4	printed
Foundation Models	GLM-4.5-Air	59.8	printed
Foundation Models	Claude Sonnet 4	59.2	printed
Foundation Models	Gemini 2.5 Pro	58.8	printed
Foundation Models	Qwen3-235B-A22B	56.5	printed
Foundation Models	DeepSeek-R1-0528	55.9	printed
Foundation Models	Kimi K2	53.1	printed
Foundation Models	GPT-4.1	48.7	printed

Showing 12 of 56. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/cec9fb38b166.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/cec9fb38b166.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/cec9fb38b166.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id cec9fb38b166.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/cec9fb38b166`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/cec9fb38b166/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/cec9fb38b166/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/cec9fb38b166/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-4

GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation

OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes

Data

GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025

LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes

Data

GLM-4: Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 8, 2025

Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison364.4K views · 1.8K likes

Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level

OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026

Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026

LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026

LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026

Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026

Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiOct 12, 2026

LLM Performance on Harvey LAB533.2K views · 6.3K likes

Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Aug 11, 2025 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.