Models
Z.ai
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation

Z.aiX · Jan 19, 2026 · official

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation

Z.ai's grouped bar chart drew 1.7M views on X: 8.2x its median post and #70 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

6 LLM benchmarks performance evaluation

XData Grouped bar chart GLM-4 All Z.ai modelsGLM-4.7-FlashQwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507GPT-OSS-20B

Z.ai: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation — Published by Z.ai on X, Jan 19, 2026. Source: x.com

80/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#47 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #2 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, at #47 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 1.7M views sit 8.2x above Z.ai's 201K median, the #5 of 34 Z.ai posts by views.

At 10 views per follower against a 0.20 median, it lands in the 97th percentile and top decile.

A score of 80 puts it at #47 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #2 of 34 Z.ai posts.

8.2xZ.ai's median post

1.7M views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

19xthe median grouped bar chart post

Across 108 grouped bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 87.5K views.

10views per follower

1.7M views from an account with 165.3K followers.

bottom 18%engagement rate

0.41% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #47 of 1,162

Views	1.7M	#70	top 6%
Likes	5.3K	#60	top 5%
Engagement rate	0.41%	#948	bottom 18%
Save rate	0.138%	#262	top 23%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #2 of 34

Views	1.7M	#5	top 13%
Likes	5.3K	#7	top 19%
Engagement rate	0.41%	#29	bottom 16%
Save rate	0.138%	#5	top 13%

Growth

Our reads cover 21 hours

Views1.7M

Age at our read267 days

Views per day of life6.2Kviews divided by days since it was posted

Gained between our reads+22views over 21 hours, about 25 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Jan 19, 2026

Z.ai posts 6 LLM benchmarks in one grouped bar chart

The January 19, 2026 chart drew 1.7M views and 5.3K likes, an 0.41% engagement rate, with a 0.14% save rate.

What happened

Z.ai published a grouped bar chart on January 19, 2026, covering 6 LLM benchmarks performance evaluation. It was the account's only post that day.

The numbers

It reached 1.7M views, #70 of 1,162 AI chart posts, against a 39.9K median among AI chart posts. Its score of 80 ranks #47 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #2 of 34 Z.ai posts.

The lesson

A grouped bar chart with 3 models shown drew 1.7M views but an 0.41% engagement rate and a 0.14% save rate. The reach is there; the saves are not.

What it means

At #2 of 34 Z.ai posts by score and #5 of 34 by views, this is the account's strongest chart post by reach. Its 0.41% engagement rate sits below the AI chart median, so the 1.7M views did not carry into saves.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

Data and API

18 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 97%

Series	Group	Value	Read
GLM-4.7-Flash	SWE-bench Verified	59.2	printed
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507	SWE-bench Verified	22	printed
GPT-OSS-20B	SWE-bench Verified	34	printed
GLM-4.7-Flash	τ²-Bench	79.5	printed
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507	τ²-Bench	49	printed
GPT-OSS-20B	τ²-Bench	47.7	printed
GLM-4.7-Flash	BrowseComp	42.8	printed
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507	BrowseComp	22.9	printed
GPT-OSS-20B	BrowseComp	28.3	printed
GLM-4.7-Flash	AIME 25	91.6	printed
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507	AIME 25	85	printed
GPT-OSS-20B	AIME 25	91.7	printed

Showing 12 of 18. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/6a7e9066bc16.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/6a7e9066bc16.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/6a7e9066bc16.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 6a7e9066bc16.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/6a7e9066bc16`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/6a7e9066bc16/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/6a7e9066bc16/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/6a7e9066bc16/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-4

OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes

Data

GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes

Data

GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025

LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes

Data

GLM-4: Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 8, 2025

Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison364.4K views · 1.8K likes

Data

GLM-4: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v3.0

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 28, 2025

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v3.0338.6K views · 1.2K likes

Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level

OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026

Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026

LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026

LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026

Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026

Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiOct 12, 2026

LLM Performance on Harvey LAB533.2K views · 6.3K likes

Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Jan 19, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.