Models
Z.ai
Multimodal Benchmark Comparison

Z.aiX · Apr 1, 2026 · official

Multimodal Benchmark Comparison

Z.ai's table chart drew 65.4K views on X: 0.3x its median post and #469 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

GLM-5V-Turbo leads multimodal benchmarks

XData Table chart GLM-5 All Z.ai models Claude Opus 4.6GLM-5V-TurboKimi K2.5

Z.ai: Multimodal Benchmark Comparison — Published by Z.ai on X, Apr 1, 2026. Source: x.com

52/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#589 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #26 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, at #589 of 1,162 AI chart posts by score.

Its 65.4K views sit at 0.32x Z.ai's 201K median, ranking #22 of 34 Z.ai posts.

Engagement of 0.52% lands at the 31st percentile among AI chart posts, below the 0.73% median.

Views per follower of 0.40 against 165K followers sits at the 63rd percentile, above the 0.20 median.

0.3xZ.ai's median post

65.4K views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

0.40views per follower

65.4K views from an account with 165.3K followers.

bottom 31%engagement rate

0.52% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

0.5xthe median table chart post

Across 95 table chart posts we hold, the median gets 133.2K views.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #589 of 1,162

Views	65.4K	#469	top 40%
Likes	294	#575	top 49%
Engagement rate	0.52%	#804	bottom 31%
Save rate	0.090%	#495	top 43%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #26 of 34

Views	65.4K	#22	bottom 37%
Likes	294	#25	bottom 28%
Engagement rate	0.52%	#21	bottom 40%
Save rate	0.090%	#15	top 43%

Growth

One read so far

Views65.4K

Age at our read194 days

Views per day of life337views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Apr 1, 2026

Z.ai posts GLM-5V-Turbo multimodal benchmark table chart

A single table chart on April 1, 2026 drew 65.4K views and a 0.52% engagement rate, below the AI chart median.

What happened

Z.ai published one table chart on April 1, 2026, comparing multimodal benchmarks. It was the account's only post that day.

The numbers

It reached 65.4K views, #469 of 1,162 AI chart posts, and scored #589 of 1,162 AI chart posts. Among Z.ai posts it ranks #22 of 34 by views and #26 of 34 by score.

The lesson

A 3-model table chart drew 65.4K views but a 0.52% engagement rate, below the 0.73% AI chart median. The save rate of 0.090% shows the table format did not convert views into saves.

What it means

At #26 of 34 Z.ai posts by score and 0.32x the company's 201K median views, this chart post trails the account's own output. The 0.52% engagement rate against the 0.56% account median shows the gap holds on engagement too.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

Data and API

36 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 54%

Series	Group	Value	Read
GLM-5V-Turbo	Multimodal Coding	94.8	printed
Kimi K2.5	Multimodal Coding	91.3	printed
Claude Opus 4.6	Multimodal Coding	77.3	printed
GLM-5V-Turbo	Multimodal Coding	93.8	printed
Kimi K2.5	Multimodal Coding	88.8	printed
Claude Opus 4.6	Multimodal Coding	98.8	printed
GLM-5V-Turbo	Multimodal ToolUse	30.85	printed
Kimi K2.5	Multimodal ToolUse	33.2	printed
GLM-5V-Turbo	Multimodal ToolUse	30.7	printed
Kimi K2.5	Multimodal ToolUse	24.4	printed
GLM-5V-Turbo	Multimodal ToolUse	51.9	printed
Kimi K2.5	Multimodal ToolUse	42.9	printed

Showing 12 of 36. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/e88c029dc3d7.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/e88c029dc3d7.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/e88c029dc3d7.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id e88c029dc3d7.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/e88c029dc3d7`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/e88c029dc3d7/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/e88c029dc3d7/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/e88c029dc3d7/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-5

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level

OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026

Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026

LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026

LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026

Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes

Data

GLM-5: Frontier models intelligence versus cost per task

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 18, 2026

Frontier models intelligence versus cost per task532.1K views · 3.8K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks253.9K views · 1.2K likes

Data

More from Z.ai

OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026

Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes

Data

GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation

OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes

Data

GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025

LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes

Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Apr 1, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.