1. Models
  2. Z.ai
  3. Agentic Coding: SWE-Bench Pro
Z.aiX · Apr 7, 2026 · official

Agentic Coding: SWE-Bench Pro

Z.ai's bar chart drew 201.3K views on X: 1.0x its median post and #260 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

XDataBar chartGLM-5.1All Z.ai modelsGPT-5.4Claude Opus 4.6Gemini 3.1 ProQwen3.6-PlusMiniMax M2.7Kimi K2.5
Published by Z.ai on X, Apr 7, 2026. Source: x.com
63/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#379 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #20 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, at #379 of 1,162 AI chart posts by score.

Its 1.22 views per follower sits above the 0.20 median across posts with known followers, a 6.1x ratio at the 81st percentile.

Saves land at 0.052% against a 0.076% median among AI chart posts, a 0.68x ratio at the 31st percentile.

The account posted 3 times that day, and this post ranks #2 of 3 by views among them.

7.9xthe median bar chart post

Across 241 bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 25.6K views.

3posts from Z.ai that day

Part of a run of 3 posts on Apr 7, 2026. This one was #2 of 3 by views that day.

bottom 31%save rate

0.052% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

bottom 33%engagement rate

0.55% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #379 of 1,162

Views201.3K#260top 22%
Likes953#282top 24%
Engagement rate0.55%#782bottom 33%
Save rate0.052%#804bottom 31%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #20 of 34

Views201.3K#17top 49%
Likes953#18bottom 49%
Engagement rate0.55%#19bottom 46%
Save rate0.052%#25bottom 28%

Growth

Our reads cover 28 hours

Views201.3K
Age at our read189 days
Views per day of life1.1Kviews divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+12views over 28 hours, about 10 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Apr 7, 2026

Z.ai posts SWE-Bench Pro bar chart for agentic coding

The April 7, 2026 bar chart drew 201K views and 953 likes, with a 0.55% engagement rate and a 0.052% save rate.

What happened

Z.ai published a bar chart on Agentic Coding: SWE-Bench Pro on April 7, 2026. It was one of 3 posts from the account that day, alongside Coding Performance Evaluation and QPS Optimization Iterations.

The numbers

The post reached 201K views, ranking #260 of 1,162 AI chart posts, against a 39.9K median among AI chart posts. Its score of 63 ranks #379 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #20 of 34 Z.ai posts.

The lesson

A 7-model bar chart with a 0.052% save rate sits at the 31st percentile among AI chart posts, below the 0.076% median. The 1.22 views per follower shows the chart travelled, but saves did not follow at that rate.

What it means

At #20 of 34 Z.ai posts by score, this chart sits mid-pack for the account. Its 0.052% save rate against the 0.076% AI chart median marks a gap in the metric that keeps a chart citable.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

  1. QPS Optimization Iterations81.7K views
  2. Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views
  3. LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks253.9K views
  4. Long-Horizon Task Evaluation95.7K views
  5. LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views
  6. Frontier models intelligence versus cost per task532.1K views

Data and API

7 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 97%
SeriesGroupValueRead
GLM-5.158.4printed
GPT-5.457.7printed
Claude Opus 4.657.3printed
Qwen3.6-Plus56.6printed
MiniMax M2.756.2printed
Gemini 3.1 Pro54.2printed
Kimi K2.553.8printed

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/bb31a119421a.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/bb31a119421a.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/bb31a119421a.skill.md
Make one like thisOpen the post JSONChart data JSONSkill fileAPI docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id bb31a119421a.

See the Max planAPI docs
PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/bb31a119421aTitle, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/bb31a119421a/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/bb31a119421a/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/bb31a119421a/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-5.1

GLM-5.1: Coding Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026
Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes
Data
GLM-5.1: QPS Optimization Iterations
OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026
QPS Optimization Iterations81.7K views · 449 likes
Data
GLM-5.1: Code Arena Overall Ranking
X · @arenaMay 26, 2026
Code Arena Overall Ranking457.1K views · 1.3K likes
Data
GLM-5.1: Intelligence vs. Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Index
X · @ArtificialAnlysApr 8, 2026
Intelligence vs. Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Index1.3K views · 10 likes
Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level
OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026
Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026
LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026
LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes
Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Apr 7, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.