Models
Z.ai
Intelligence vs. Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Index

@ArtificialAnlysX · Apr 8, 2026

Intelligence vs. Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Index

@ArtificialAnlys's scatter plot drew 1.3K views on X: 0.1x @artificialanlys's median post and #1,118 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

XData Scatter plot GLM-5.1 All Z.ai models Gemini 3 FlashArtificial AnalysisGPT-5.4 (xhigh)Claude Sonnet 4.5 (max)Claude Opus 4.6 (max)Claude 4.5 HaikuGrok 4.20 0309 v2

@ArtificialAnlys: Intelligence vs. Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Index — Published by @ArtificialAnlys on X, Apr 8, 2026. Source: x.com

24/ 100

ViralChart score

Small but loved

Fewer views than the median post but a higher engagement rate: a smaller crowd that acted on it.

#1,020 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #384 of 491 @artificialanlys posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

Small but loved: views below the AI chart median, engagement at or above it, score rank #1,020 of 1,162.

Its 1.3K views ran at 0.11x the company median of 11.4K, ranking #461 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts.

On launch day, it ranked #8 of 8 posts from @ArtificialAnlys, below all 7 other posts that day.

Its score of 24 placed it #1,020 of 1,162 AI chart posts, below the median.

0.1x@artificialanlys's median post

1.3K views, where @artificialanlys's typical post gets 11.4K.

0.1xthe median scatter plot post

Across 187 scatter plot posts we hold, the median gets 22.4K views.

8posts from @artificialanlys that day

Part of a run of 8 posts on Apr 8, 2026. This one was #8 of 8 by views that day.

top 18%save rate

0.155% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 491 from @artificialanlys.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #1,020 of 1,162

Views	1.3K	#1,118	bottom 4%
Likes	10	#1,118	bottom 4%
Engagement rate	0.85%	#439	top 38%
Save rate	0.155%	#211	top 18%

Among 491 @artificialanlys posts

Score #384 of 491

Views	1.3K	#461	bottom 6%
Likes	10	#455	bottom 7%
Engagement rate	0.85%	#220	top 45%
Save rate	0.155%	#109	top 22%

Growth

One read so far

Views1.3K

Age at our read187 days

Views per day of life7views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

@artificialanlys's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Apr 8, 2026

@ArtificialAnlys scatter plot on Intelligence vs. Cost draws 1.3K views

A single scatter plot on Intelligence vs. Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Index, posted April 8, 2026.

What happened

The post is a scatter plot showing Intelligence vs. Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Index, with 18 models. It was one of 8 posts from @ArtificialAnlys that day, alongside 7 others including a 513K-view index post.

The numbers

Views were 1.3K, ranking #1,118 of 1,162 AI chart posts, below the 39.9K median. Score was 24, ranking #1,020 of 1,162.

The lesson

A scatter plot with 18 models and 1 chart drew 1.3K views, 0.11x the company median. Readers saved it at 0.15%, a rate below the engagement rate of 0.85%.

What it means

For @ArtificialAnlys, this post ranks #384 of 491, far below its own median. The gap to the 39.9K median shows low reach for a dense model comparison.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what @artificialanlys posted next

Data and API

20 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 41%

Series	Group	Value	Read
MiniMax	MiniMax-M2.7	50	estimated
Xiaomi	MiMo-V2-Pro	54	estimated
Google	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	57	estimated
OpenAI	GPT-5.4 (xhigh)	58	estimated
Anthropic	Claude Sonnet 4.6 (max)	55	estimated
Anthropic	Claude Opus 4.6 (max)	54	estimated
Alibaba	Qwen3.6 Plus	52	estimated
Z AI	GLM-5.1	52	estimated
Kimi	Kimi K2.5	50	estimated
Alibaba	Qwen3.5 397B A17B	49	estimated
Google	Gemini 3 Flash	46	estimated
xAI	Grok 4.20 0309 v2	46	printed

Showing 12 of 20. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/eda348b3f010.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/eda348b3f010.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/eda348b3f010.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id eda348b3f010.

Approximate values. Our two readings of this chart agreed only in part (confidence 0.41 of 1), so check the original before you quote a number. The API marks it lowConfidence, and ?min_confidence=0.5 leaves it out.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/eda348b3f010`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/eda348b3f010/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/eda348b3f010/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/eda348b3f010/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-5.1

OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026

Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026

Agentic Coding: SWE-Bench Pro201.3K views · 953 likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026

QPS Optimization Iterations81.7K views · 449 likes

Data

X · @arenaMay 26, 2026

Code Arena Overall Ranking457.1K views · 1.3K likes

Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level

OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026

Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026

LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026

LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes

Data

GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation

OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes

Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

@ArtificialAnlys published it on Apr 8, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.