1. Models
  2. Z.ai
  3. Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level
Z.aiX · Jun 16, 2026 · official

Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level

Z.ai's line chart drew 7.7M views on X: 38x its median post and #17 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

XDataLine chartGLM-5All Z.ai modelsGLM-5.1Claude Opus 4.7GLM-5.2Claude Opus 4.8
Published by Z.ai on X, Jun 16, 2026. Source: x.com
75/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#113 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #11 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in Wide but thin, at #113 of 1,162 AI chart posts by score.

Its 7.7M views are 38x Z.ai's median post, the #1 of 34 Z.ai posts by views.

At 47 views per follower it sits in the top decile, the 99th percentile among posts with known followers.

Engagement lands at 0.22%, the 5th percentile among AI chart posts and #1,107 of 1,162.

38xZ.ai's median post

7.7M views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

104xthe median line chart post

Across 68 line chart posts we hold, the median gets 73.7K views.

46views per follower

7.7M views from an account with 165.3K followers.

bottom 5%engagement rate

0.22% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #113 of 1,162

Views7.7M#17top 1%
Likes13.1K#23top 2%
Engagement rate0.22%#1,107bottom 5%
Save rate0.061%#707bottom 39%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #11 of 34

Views7.7M#1top 1%
Likes13.1K#3top 7%
Engagement rate0.22%#34bottom 1%
Save rate0.061%#21bottom 40%

Growth

Our reads cover 27 hours

Views7.7M
Age at our read119 days
Views per day of life64.5Kviews divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+395views over 27 hours, about 357 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Jun 16, 2026 · Lead story

Z.ai posts agentic coding performance by effort level

A line chart of agentic coding performance by effort level drew 7.7M views and 13.1K likes, with engagement at 0.22%.

What happened

Z.ai published a line chart on June 16, 2026 titled Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level. It was one of 3 posts from the account that day, alongside LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks and Long-Horizon Task Evaluation.

The numbers

The post reached 7.7M views, #17 of 1,162 AI chart posts, against a median of 39.9K. Its score of 75 ranks #113 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #11 of 34 Z.ai posts.

The lesson

A line chart at 0.22% engagement sits in the bottom decile while the same post's 7.7M views rank #17 of 1,162 AI chart posts. The chart shows Claude Opus 4.8 (High) at 79% and GLM-5.1 (Non-Thinking) at 53%.

What it means

At 38x Z.ai's median views but the 5th percentile on engagement, this post's 7.7M views come with a 0.22% rate against the 0.73% median among AI chart posts.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

  1. LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks253.9K views
  2. Long-Horizon Task Evaluation95.7K views
  3. LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views
  4. Frontier models intelligence versus cost per task532.1K views
  5. LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views
  6. Agentic Code Bench performance by effort level201.2K views

Data and API

11 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 50%
SeriesGroupValueRead
Claude Opus 4.8Low61 %printed
Claude Opus 4.8High79 %printed
Claude Opus 4.8Max79 %estimated
Claude Opus 4.7Low61 %printed
Claude Opus 4.7High69 %printed
Claude Opus 4.7Max71 %printed
GLM-5.2Non-Thinking63 %estimated
GLM-5.2High71.5 %estimated
GLM-5.2Max74 %estimated
GLM-5.1Non-Thinking53 %printed
GLM-5.1Max59.5 %estimated

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/a87adaef197a.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/a87adaef197a.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/a87adaef197a.skill.md
Make one like thisOpen the post JSONChart data JSONSkill fileAPI docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id a87adaef197a.

See the Max planAPI docs
PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/a87adaef197aTitle, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/a87adaef197a/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/a87adaef197a/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/a87adaef197a/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-5

GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026
LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026
LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes
Data
GLM-5: Coding Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026
Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes
Data
GLM-5: Frontier models intelligence versus cost per task
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 18, 2026
Frontier models intelligence versus cost per task532.1K views · 3.8K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks253.9K views · 1.2K likes
Data
GLM-5: Agentic Code Bench performance by effort level
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026
Agentic Code Bench performance by effort level201.2K views · 1K likes
Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5.1: Coding Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026
Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025
LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes
Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Jun 16, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.