1. Models
  2. Z.ai
  3. Coding Performance Evaluation
Z.aiX · Apr 7, 2026 · official

Coding Performance Evaluation

Z.ai's bar chart drew 4.4M views on X: 22x its median post and #35 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

Coding Performance SWE-Bench Pro Terminal-Bench 2.0 NL2Repo

XDataBar chartGLM-5.1All Z.ai modelsGPT-5.4Claude Opus 4.6Gemini 3.1 ProQwen3.6-PlusMiniMax M2.7Kimi K2.5
Published by Z.ai on X, Apr 7, 2026. Source: x.com
78/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#72 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #7 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, with a score rank of #72 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 4.4M views sit 22x above Z.ai's median post of 201K, ranking #4 of 34 Z.ai posts.

At 26 views per follower against a median of 0.20, it lands in the 98th percentile and top decile.

A score of 78 places it at #72 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #7 of 34 Z.ai posts.

170xthe median bar chart post

Across 241 bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 25.6K views.

22xZ.ai's median post

4.4M views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

26views per follower

4.4M views from an account with 165.3K followers.

bottom 9%engagement rate

0.30% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #72 of 1,162

Views4.4M#35top 3%
Likes10.7K#28top 2%
Engagement rate0.30%#1,056bottom 9%
Save rate0.094%#466top 40%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #7 of 34

Views4.4M#4top 10%
Likes10.7K#4top 10%
Engagement rate0.30%#32bottom 7%
Save rate0.094%#14top 40%

Growth

Our reads cover 27 hours

Views4.4M
Age at our read189 days
Views per day of life23Kviews divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+109views over 27 hours, about 98 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Apr 7, 2026 · Lead story

Z.ai posts coding performance bar chart with 7 models

The April 7, 2026 bar chart drew 4.4M views and a 0.30% engagement rate, landing in the Wide but thin quadrant.

What happened

Z.ai published a bar chart on April 7, 2026 covering Coding Performance Evaluation with 7 models shown. That day the account posted 3 posts, including Agentic Coding: SWE-Bench Pro at 201K views and QPS Optimization Iterations at 81.7K views.

The numbers

It reached 4.4M views, ranking #35 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #4 of 34 Z.ai posts. Its score of 78 ranks #72 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #7 of 34 Z.ai posts.

The lesson

A single bar chart with 7 models shown drew 4.4M views, 22x Z.ai's median of 201K. Yet its 0.30% engagement rate sits below the AI chart median, so the reach did not carry the save rate.

What it means

At #7 of 34 Z.ai posts by score and #72 of 1,162 AI chart posts, this chart travels far on views but its 0.30% engagement rate trails the median. The 22x gap over Z.ai's 201K median shows reach and engagement are not moving together here.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

  1. Agentic Coding: SWE-Bench Pro201.3K views
  2. QPS Optimization Iterations81.7K views
  3. Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views
  4. LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks253.9K views
  5. Long-Horizon Task Evaluation95.7K views
  6. LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views

Data and API

7 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 97%
SeriesGroupValueRead
GPT-5.458printed
Claude Opus 4.657.5printed
GLM-5.154.9printed
Gemini 3.1 Pro52printed
Qwen3.6-Plus52printed
MiniMax M2.751printed
Kimi K2.545.5printed

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/081300e29869.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/081300e29869.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/081300e29869.skill.md
Make one like thisOpen the post JSONChart data JSONSkill fileAPI docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 081300e29869.

See the Max planAPI docs
PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/081300e29869Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/081300e29869/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/081300e29869/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/081300e29869/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-5.1

GLM-5.1: Agentic Coding: SWE-Bench Pro
OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026
Agentic Coding: SWE-Bench Pro201.3K views · 953 likes
Data
GLM-5.1: QPS Optimization Iterations
OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026
QPS Optimization Iterations81.7K views · 449 likes
Data
GLM-5.1: Code Arena Overall Ranking
X · @arenaMay 26, 2026
Code Arena Overall Ranking457.1K views · 1.3K likes
Data
GLM-5.1: Intelligence vs. Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Index
X · @ArtificialAnlysApr 8, 2026
Intelligence vs. Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Index1.3K views · 10 likes
Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level
OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026
Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026
LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026
LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes
Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Apr 7, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.