Models
Z.ai
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation

Z.aiX · Dec 22, 2025 · official

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation

Z.ai's grouped bar chart drew 1.4M views on X: 7.1x its median post and #83 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

8 LLM benchmarks performance evaluation across multiple tasks

XData Grouped bar chart GLM-4 All Z.ai models GLM-4.7GLM-4.6DeepSeek-V3.2Claude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5.1

Z.ai: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation — Published by Z.ai on X, Dec 22, 2025. Source: x.com

72/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#173 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #14 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Wide but thin quadrant at #173 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 1.4M views are 7.1x Z.ai's median post, ranking #7 of 34 Z.ai posts.

At 8.64 views per follower, it sits in the 96th percentile and the top decile.

Engagement of 0.30% lands in the 9th percentile, a bottom decile against the 0.73% median.

7.1xZ.ai's median post

1.4M views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

16xthe median grouped bar chart post

Across 108 grouped bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 87.5K views.

8.63views per follower

1.4M views from an account with 165.3K followers.

bottom 9%engagement rate

0.30% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #173 of 1,162

Views	1.4M	#83	top 7%
Likes	3.3K	#92	top 8%
Engagement rate	0.30%	#1,054	bottom 9%
Save rate	0.061%	#710	bottom 39%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #14 of 34

Views	1.4M	#7	top 19%
Likes	3.3K	#10	top 28%
Engagement rate	0.30%	#31	bottom 10%
Save rate	0.061%	#22	bottom 37%

Growth

Our reads cover 26 hours

Views1.4M

Age at our read295 days

Views per day of life4.8Kviews divided by days since it was posted

Gained between our reads+17views over 26 hours, about 15 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Dec 22, 2025 · Lead story

Z.ai posts 8 LLM benchmarks in one grouped bar chart

The December 22, 2025 chart drew 1.4M views, 7.1x Z.ai's median, while engagement of 0.30% fell to the 9th percentile.

What happened

Z.ai published a grouped bar chart on December 22, 2025 covering 8 LLM benchmarks performance evaluation. The account posted 2 items that day, including GLM-4.7 vs GLM-4.6 in Real-world Development Scenarios at 25.3K views.

The numbers

It reached 1.4M views, #83 of 1,162 AI chart posts, against a median of 39.9K. Its score of 72 ranks #173 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #14 of 34 Z.ai posts.

The lesson

A single grouped bar chart with 5 models drew 1.4M views but a 0.30% engagement rate, below the 0.73% median. The save rate of 0.061% shows the chart was seen far more than it was kept.

What it means

At #14 of 34 Z.ai posts by score, this chart trails the account's own best while its 1.4M views sit 7.1x the Z.ai median. The 0.30% engagement rate against the 0.56% account median marks the gap between reach and response.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

Data and API

40 points read off this chart

Partly publisher's numbers 79%

Series	Group	Value	Read
GLM-4.7	AIME 25	95.7	printed
GLM-4.6	AIME 25	93.9	printed
DeepSeek-V3.2	AIME 25	93.1	printed
Claude Sonnet 4.5	AIME 25	87	printed
GPT-5.1 (High)	AIME 25	94	printed
GLM-4.7	LiveCodeBench v6	84.9	printed
GLM-4.6	LiveCodeBench v6	82.8	printed
DeepSeek-V3.2	LiveCodeBench v6	83.3	printed
Claude Sonnet 4.5	LiveCodeBench v6	64	printed
GPT-5.1 (High)	LiveCodeBench v6	85.7	printed
GLM-4.7	GPQA-Diamond	85.7	printed
GLM-4.6	GPQA-Diamond	81.7	printed

Showing 12 of 40. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/33d90f6f6394.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/33d90f6f6394.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/33d90f6f6394.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 33d90f6f6394.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/33d90f6f6394`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/33d90f6f6394/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/33d90f6f6394/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/33d90f6f6394/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-4

GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation

OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes

Data

GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025

LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes

Data

GLM-4: Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 8, 2025

Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison364.4K views · 1.8K likes

Data

GLM-4: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v3.0

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 28, 2025

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v3.0338.6K views · 1.2K likes

Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level

OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026

Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026

LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026

LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026

Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026

Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiOct 12, 2026

LLM Performance on Harvey LAB533.2K views · 6.3K likes

Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Dec 22, 2025 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.