1. Models
  2. Z.ai
  3. Coding Evaluation
Z.aiX · Mar 27, 2026 · official

Coding Evaluation

Z.ai's benchmark bar chart drew 1.3M views on X: 6.5x its median post and #92 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

Coding Evaluation with Claude and GLM models

XDataBenchmark bar chartGLM-5All Z.ai modelsClaude Opus 4.6GLM-5.1
Published by Z.ai on X, Mar 27, 2026. Source: x.com
79/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#61 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #5 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, at #61 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 1.3M views sit 6.5x above Z.ai's 201K median, ranking #9 of 34 Z.ai posts.

At 7.89 views per follower against a 0.20 median, it lands in the 96th percentile.

A score of 79 puts it at #61 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #5 of 34 Z.ai posts.

29xthe median benchmark bar chart post

Across 215 benchmark bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 44.4K views.

6.5xZ.ai's median post

1.3M views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

7.87views per follower

1.3M views from an account with 165.3K followers.

bottom 30%engagement rate

0.52% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #61 of 1,162

Views1.3M#92top 8%
Likes5.4K#58top 5%
Engagement rate0.52%#814bottom 30%
Save rate0.096%#454top 39%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #5 of 34

Views1.3M#9top 25%
Likes5.4K#6top 16%
Engagement rate0.52%#23bottom 34%
Save rate0.096%#12top 34%

Growth

Our reads cover 27 hours

Views1.3M
Age at our read200 days
Views per day of life6.5Kviews divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+25views over 27 hours, about 22 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Mar 27, 2026

Z.ai posts coding evaluation chart with Claude and GLM models

The March 27, 2026 benchmark bar chart drew 1.3M views and a 0.52% engagement rate, with 5.4K likes.

What happened

Z.ai published a benchmark bar chart on March 27, 2026, covering coding evaluation with Claude and GLM models. It was the account's only post that day.

The numbers

It reached 1.3M views, #92 of 1,162 AI chart posts, against a 39.9K median among AI chart posts. Its score of 79 ranks #61 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #5 of 34 Z.ai posts.

The lesson

A single benchmark bar chart with 3 models shown drew 1.3M views, 6.5x Z.ai's 201K median. The 0.52% engagement rate against a 0.096% save rate marks it as wide but thin.

What it means

At #5 of 34 Z.ai posts, this chart sits below the account's top posts by score while its 1.3M views run 6.5x the 201K company median. The 0.52% engagement rate trails the reach.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

  1. Multimodal Benchmark Comparison65.4K views
  2. Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views
  3. Agentic Coding: SWE-Bench Pro201.3K views
  4. QPS Optimization Iterations81.7K views
  5. Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views
  6. LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks253.9K views

Data and API

3 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 97%
SeriesGroupValueRead
Claude Opus 4.647.9printed
GLM-5.145.3printed
GLM-535.4printed

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/7b0e4ace31b0.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/7b0e4ace31b0.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/7b0e4ace31b0.skill.md
Make one like thisOpen the post JSONChart data JSONSkill fileAPI docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 7b0e4ace31b0.

See the Max planAPI docs
PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/7b0e4ace31b0Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/7b0e4ace31b0/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/7b0e4ace31b0/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/7b0e4ace31b0/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-5

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level
OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026
Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026
LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026
LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes
Data
GLM-5: Frontier models intelligence versus cost per task
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 18, 2026
Frontier models intelligence versus cost per task532.1K views · 3.8K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks253.9K views · 1.2K likes
Data
GLM-5: Agentic Code Bench performance by effort level
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026
Agentic Code Bench performance by effort level201.2K views · 1K likes
Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5.1: Coding Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026
Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025
LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes
Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Mar 27, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.