1. Models
  2. Z.ai
  3. LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
Z.aiX · Jun 16, 2026 · official

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks

Z.ai's grouped bar chart drew 253.9K views on X: 1.3x its median post and #232 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

LLM performance across eight benchmarks with tool use

XDataGrouped bar chartGLM-5All Z.ai modelsGLM-5.1Gemini 3.1 ProGLM-5.2Claude Opus 4.8GPT-5.5
Published by Z.ai on X, Jun 16, 2026. Source: x.com
65/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#334 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #18 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, at #334 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 1.54 views per follower sits at the 83rd percentile among posts with known followers, against a 0.20 median.

Saves land at 0.049%, the 28th percentile among AI chart posts and below the 0.076% median.

A score of 65 puts it at #334 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #18 of 34 Z.ai posts.

3posts from Z.ai that day

Part of a run of 3 posts on Jun 16, 2026. This one was #2 of 3 by views that day.

2.9xthe median grouped bar chart post

Across 108 grouped bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 87.5K views.

bottom 28%save rate

0.049% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

bottom 31%engagement rate

0.52% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #334 of 1,162

Views253.9K#232top 20%
Likes1.2K#242top 21%
Engagement rate0.52%#806bottom 31%
Save rate0.049%#838bottom 28%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #18 of 34

Views253.9K#16top 46%
Likes1.2K#16top 46%
Engagement rate0.52%#22bottom 37%
Save rate0.049%#27bottom 22%

Growth

Our reads cover 28 hours

Views253.9K
Age at our read119 days
Views per day of life2.1Kviews divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+41views over 28 hours, about 35 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Jun 16, 2026

Z.ai posts LLM performance across 8 benchmarks

The grouped bar chart drew 254K views and a 0.52% engagement rate, with saves at the 28th percentile.

What happened

Z.ai published a grouped bar chart on June 16, 2026 covering LLM performance across eight benchmarks with tool use. It was one of 3 posts from the account that day, alongside Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level and Long-Horizon Task Evaluation.

The numbers

It reached 254K views, #232 of 1,162 AI chart posts, against a 39.9K median among AI chart posts. Its score of 65 ranks #334 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #18 of 34 Z.ai posts.

The lesson

A save rate of 0.049% lands at the 28th percentile among AI chart posts, below the 0.076% median. The chart shows printed values such as GLM-5.2 (SWE-bench Pro): 62.1 and Claude Opus 4.8 (SWE-bench Pro): 69.2.

What it means

At #18 of 34 Z.ai posts, this chart sits mid-pack for the account while its 1.54 views per follower is 83rd percentile. The 0.049% save rate against a 0.076% median marks the gap between reach and retention.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

  1. Long-Horizon Task Evaluation95.7K views
  2. LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views
  3. Frontier models intelligence versus cost per task532.1K views
  4. LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views
  5. Agentic Code Bench performance by effort level201.2K views
  6. LLM Performance on Harvey LAB533.2K views

Data and API

52 points read off this chart

Partly publisher's numbers 85%
SeriesGroupValueRead
GLM-5.2SWE-bench Pro62.1 scoreprinted
GLM-5.1SWE-bench Pro58.4 scoreprinted
Claude Opus 4.8SWE-bench Pro69.2 scoreprinted
GPT-5.2SWE-bench Pro58.6 scoreprinted
Gemini 3.1 ProSWE-bench Pro54.2 scoreprinted
GLM-5.2Terminal-Bench 2.181 scoreprinted
GLM-5.1Terminal-Bench 2.163.5 scoreprinted
Claude Opus 4.8Terminal-Bench 2.185 scoreprinted
GPT-5.2Terminal-Bench 2.169.7 scoreprinted
GLM-5.2NL2Repo48.9 scoreprinted
GLM-5.1NL2Repo42.7 scoreprinted
Claude Opus 4.8NL2Repo50.7 scoreprinted

Showing 12 of 52. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/9ea432cb7f2a.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/9ea432cb7f2a.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/9ea432cb7f2a.skill.md
Make one like thisOpen the post JSONChart data JSONSkill fileAPI docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 9ea432cb7f2a.

See the Max planAPI docs
PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/9ea432cb7f2aTitle, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/9ea432cb7f2a/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/9ea432cb7f2a/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/9ea432cb7f2a/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-5

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level
OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026
Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026
LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026
LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes
Data
GLM-5: Coding Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026
Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes
Data
GLM-5: Frontier models intelligence versus cost per task
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 18, 2026
Frontier models intelligence versus cost per task532.1K views · 3.8K likes
Data
GLM-5: Agentic Code Bench performance by effort level
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026
Agentic Code Bench performance by effort level201.2K views · 1K likes
Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5.1: Coding Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026
Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025
LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes
Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Jun 16, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.