1. Models
  2. Z.ai
  3. Agentic Code Bench performance by effort level
Z.aiX · Aug 26, 2026 · official

Agentic Code Bench performance by effort level

Z.ai's line chart drew 201.2K views on X: 1.0x its median post and #261 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

GLM-5.3 leads in accuracy across effort levels, while Claude models show higher token usage.

XDataLine chartGLM-5All Z.ai modelsGLM-5.3Claude Fable 5GLM-5.2GLM-5.3-FlashClaude Opus 4.8
Published by Z.ai on X, Aug 26, 2026. Source: x.com
62/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#409 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #21 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Wide but thin quadrant and ranks #409 of 1,162 AI chart posts by score.

Its save rate of 0.038% sits at the 19th percentile among AI chart posts, 0.49x the 0.076% median.

At 1.22 views per follower, it runs 6.1x the 0.20 median across posts with known followers.

It placed #2 of 2 posts from this account that day by views.

bottom 19%save rate

0.038% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

2posts from Z.ai that day

Part of a run of 2 posts on Aug 26, 2026. This one was #2 of 2 by views that day.

2.7xthe median line chart post

Across 68 line chart posts we hold, the median gets 73.7K views.

bottom 33%engagement rate

0.54% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #409 of 1,162

Views201.2K#261top 22%
Likes1K#269top 23%
Engagement rate0.54%#783bottom 33%
Save rate0.038%#938bottom 19%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #21 of 34

Views201.2K#18bottom 49%
Likes1K#17top 49%
Engagement rate0.54%#20bottom 43%
Save rate0.038%#31bottom 10%

Growth

Our reads cover 3 days

Views201.2K
Age at our read48 days
Views per day of life4.2Kviews divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+113views over 3 days, about 41 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Aug 26, 2026

Z.ai posts line chart on Agentic Code Bench effort levels

The August 26, 2026 line chart drew 201K views against a 39.9K median among AI chart posts, with a 0.038% save rate.

What happened

Z.ai published a line chart on Agentic Code Bench performance by effort level on August 26, 2026. It was one of 2 posts from the account that day, alongside an LLM performance chart across six benchmarks at 7M views.

The numbers

It reached 201K views, ranking #261 of 1,162 AI chart posts, and #21 of 34 Z.ai posts by score. Its engagement rate was 0.54%.

The lesson

A 0.038% save rate, 0.49x the 0.076% median among AI chart posts, shows this line chart was read but not kept. The 5 models shown and 1 chart in the post sit against a 19th percentile save rank.

What it means

At #21 of 34 Z.ai posts by score, this chart trails the account's own top posts. The 0.038% save rate against the 0.076% median among AI chart posts leaves the gap in bookmarks.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

  1. LLM Performance on Harvey LAB533.2K views

Data and API

15 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 57%
SeriesGroupValueRead
GLM-5.3Low24.5 %estimated
GLM-5.3High31.5 %estimated
GLM-5.3Max34.5 %estimated
GLM-5.2Low21.5 %printed
GLM-5.2High28 %printed
GLM-5.2Max28.5 %printed
GLM-5.3-FlashLow19.5 %printed
GLM-5.3-FlashHigh21 %printed
GLM-5.3-FlashMax23.5 %printed
Claude Fable 5Low20.5 %estimated
Claude Fable 5High35.5 %estimated
Claude Fable 5Max39.5 %estimated

Showing 12 of 15. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/2035eb94bd6e.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/2035eb94bd6e.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/2035eb94bd6e.skill.md
Make one like thisOpen the post JSONChart data JSONSkill fileAPI docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 2035eb94bd6e.

See the Max planAPI docs
PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/2035eb94bd6eTitle, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/2035eb94bd6e/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/2035eb94bd6e/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/2035eb94bd6e/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-5

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level
OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026
Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026
LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026
LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes
Data
GLM-5: Coding Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026
Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes
Data
GLM-5: Frontier models intelligence versus cost per task
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 18, 2026
Frontier models intelligence versus cost per task532.1K views · 3.8K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks253.9K views · 1.2K likes
Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5.1: Coding Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026
Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025
LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes
Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Aug 26, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.