1. Models
  2. Z.ai
  3. LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
Z.aiX · Feb 11, 2026 · official

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks

Z.ai's grouped bar chart drew 1.5M views on X: 7.5x its median post and #78 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

LLM performance across 8 benchmarks

Published by Z.ai on X, Feb 11, 2026. Source: x.com
78/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#73 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #8 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in the Wide but thin quadrant at #73 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 1.5M views sit 7.5x above Z.ai's 201K median, the #6 of 34 Z.ai posts by views.

At 9.10 views per follower against a 0.20 median, it lands in the 96th percentile.

A score of 78 puts it at #73 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #8 of 34 Z.ai posts.

7.5xZ.ai's median post

1.5M views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

17xthe median grouped bar chart post

Across 108 grouped bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 87.5K views.

9.08views per follower

1.5M views from an account with 165.3K followers.

3posts from Z.ai that day

Part of a run of 3 posts on Feb 11, 2026. This one was #1 of 3 by views that day.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #73 of 1,162

Views1.5M#78top 7%
Likes5.3K#61top 5%
Engagement rate0.44%#901bottom 23%
Save rate0.096%#458top 39%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #8 of 34

Views1.5M#6top 16%
Likes5.3K#8top 22%
Engagement rate0.44%#24bottom 31%
Save rate0.096%#13top 37%

Growth

Our reads cover 27 hours

Views1.5M
Age at our read244 days
Views per day of life6.1Kviews divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+25views over 27 hours, about 22 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Feb 11, 2026 · Lead story

Z.ai posts 5-model benchmark chart on 8 benchmarks

The grouped bar chart drew 1.5M views against a 39.9K median among AI chart posts, with a 0.44% engagement rate.

What happened

Z.ai published a grouped bar chart on LLM performance across 8 benchmarks on February 11, 2026. That day the account posted 3 posts, including CC-Bench: GLM-4.7 vs GLM-5 vs Claude Opus 4.5 and Money Balance Over Time.

The numbers

It reached 1.5M views, #78 of 1,162 AI chart posts by views and #6 of 34 Z.ai posts. Its score of 78 ranks #73 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A single grouped bar chart with 5 models reached 1.5M views, but its 0.44% engagement rate sits below the AI chart median: the reach is wide, the engagement is thin.

What it means

At #8 of 34 Z.ai posts by score, this chart sits high in the account's own output, yet its 0.44% engagement rate leaves the 1.5M views wide but thin.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Data and API

57 points read off this chart

Partly publisher's numbers 90%
SeriesGroupValueRead
GLM-4.7Humanity's Last Exam42.8printed
GLM-5Humanity's Last Exam24.8printed
Claude Opus 4.5Humanity's Last Exam50.4printed
Gemini 3 ProHumanity's Last Exam30.5printed
GPT-5.2 (xhigh)Humanity's Last Exam43.4printed
GLM-4.7Humanity's Last Exam28.4printed
GLM-5Humanity's Last Exam45.8printed
Claude Opus 4.5Humanity's Last Exam37.2printed
Gemini 3 ProHumanity's Last Exam45.5printed
GPT-5.2 (xhigh)Humanity's Last Exam35.4printed
GLM-4.7SWE-bench Verified73.8printed
GLM-5SWE-bench Verified77.8printed

Showing 12 of 57. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/4f467e304bf8.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/4f467e304bf8.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/4f467e304bf8.skill.md

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 4f467e304bf8.

PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/4f467e304bf8Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/4f467e304bf8/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/4f467e304bf8/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/4f467e304bf8/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-4

More from Z.ai

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Feb 11, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.