Models
Z.ai
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks

Z.aiX · Sep 30, 2025 · official

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks

Z.ai's grouped bar chart drew 907.8K views on X: 4.5x its median post and #104 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

8 LLM benchmarks evaluation across five AI models

XData Grouped bar chart GLM-4 All Z.ai models Claude Sonnet 4GLM-4.6GLM-4.5DeepSeek-V3.2-ExpClaude Sonnet 4.5

Z.ai: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks — Published by Z.ai on X, Sep 30, 2025. Source: x.com

67/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#288 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #15 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, at #288 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 908K views sit 4.5x above Z.ai's 201K median, at #10 of 34 Z.ai posts.

At 5.50 views per follower against a 0.20 median, it lands in the 93rd percentile.

The 0.25% engagement rate is 7th percentile among AI chart posts, against a 0.73% median.

10xthe median grouped bar chart post

Across 108 grouped bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 87.5K views.

4.5xZ.ai's median post

907.8K views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

5.49views per follower

907.8K views from an account with 165.3K followers.

bottom 7%engagement rate

0.25% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #288 of 1,162

Views	907.8K	#104	top 9%
Likes	1.8K	#177	top 15%
Engagement rate	0.25%	#1,083	bottom 7%
Save rate	0.045%	#868	bottom 25%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #15 of 34

Views	907.8K	#10	top 28%
Likes	1.8K	#13	top 37%
Engagement rate	0.25%	#33	bottom 4%
Save rate	0.045%	#28	bottom 19%

Growth

Our reads cover 27 hours

Views907.8K

Age at our read378 days

Views per day of life2.4Kviews divided by days since it was posted

Gained between our reads+1views over 27 hours, about 1 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Sep 30, 2025

Z.ai posts 8-benchmark LLM chart with 5 models

The grouped bar chart drew 908K views but a 0.25% engagement rate, 7th percentile among AI chart posts.

What happened

Z.ai, an official account, posted a grouped bar chart on September 30, 2025 covering 8 LLM benchmarks across 5 models. It was one of 3 posts from the account that day, alongside posts on GLM-4.6 agentic coding and average token usage.

The numbers

It reached 908K views, #104 of 1,162 AI chart posts, and #10 of 34 Z.ai posts. Its score of 67 ranks #288 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #15 of 34 Z.ai posts.

The lesson

A 0.25% engagement rate at the 7th percentile against a 0.73% median shows a grouped bar chart of 5 models can travel on views while drawing few likes, reposts, quotes and replies per view.

What it means

At #15 of 34 Z.ai posts by score and #10 of 34 by views, this post's 908K views against a 201K company median come with a 0.25% engagement rate below the account's own 0.56% median.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

Data and API

43 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 94%

Series	Group	Value	Read
GLM-4.6	AIME 25	98.6	printed
GLM-4.5	AIME 25	93.9	printed
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp	AIME 25	85.4	printed
Claude Sonnet 4	AIME 25	89.3	printed
Claude Sonnet 4.5	AIME 25	74.3	printed
Claude Sonnet 4.5	AIME 25	87	printed
GLM-4.6	GPQA	82.9	printed
GLM-4.5	GPQA	81	printed
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp	GPQA	79.9	printed
Claude Sonnet 4	GPQA	79.9	printed
Claude Sonnet 4.5	GPQA	77.7	printed
Claude Sonnet 4.5	GPQA	83.4	printed

Showing 12 of 43. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/d593a53669ce.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/d593a53669ce.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/d593a53669ce.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id d593a53669ce.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/d593a53669ce`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/d593a53669ce/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/d593a53669ce/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/d593a53669ce/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-4

GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation

OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes

Data

GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025

LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes

Data

GLM-4: Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 8, 2025

Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison364.4K views · 1.8K likes

Data

GLM-4: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v3.0

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 28, 2025

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v3.0338.6K views · 1.2K likes

Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level

OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026

Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026

LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026

LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026

Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026

Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiOct 12, 2026

LLM Performance on Harvey LAB533.2K views · 6.3K likes

Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Sep 30, 2025 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.