1. Models
  2. Z.ai
  3. Model Performance
Z.aiX · Oct 9, 2025 · official

Model Performance

Z.ai's bar chart drew 44.3K views on X: 0.2x its median post and #561 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

Model Performance Elo Rating comparison

XDataBar chartGLM-4All Z.ai modelsClaude Opus 4Claude Sonnet 4Claude 3.7 SonnetClaude 4.5 Sonnet (Thinking)Claude Opus 4.1 (Thinking)Claude Opus 4.1GPT-5 (Minimal)GLM 4.6
Published by Z.ai on X, Oct 9, 2025. Source: x.com
66/ 100

ViralChart score

Reached and resonated

More views and a higher engagement rate than the median post: it travelled and people acted on it.

#315 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #17 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Reached and resonated quadrant at #315 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 44.3K views sit at 0.22x Z.ai's company median of 201K, ranking #24 of 34 Z.ai posts.

Engagement of 1.59% lands in the 93rd percentile among AI chart posts, 2.2x the 0.73% median.

A score of 66 places it at #315 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #17 of 34 Z.ai posts.

0.2xZ.ai's median post

44.3K views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

top 7%engagement rate

1.59% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

0.27views per follower

44.3K views from an account with 165.3K followers.

top 25%save rate

0.129% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #315 of 1,162

Views44.3K#561top 48%
Likes626#382top 33%
Engagement rate1.59%#79top 7%
Save rate0.129%#295top 25%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #17 of 34

Views44.3K#24bottom 31%
Likes626#20bottom 43%
Engagement rate1.59%#1top 1%
Save rate0.129%#7top 19%

Growth

One read so far

Views44.3K
Age at our read368 days
Views per day of life120views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Oct 9, 2025

Z.ai posts Elo rating bar chart for 10 models

Z.ai's bar chart of Elo ratings drew 44.3K views and 1.59% engagement, landing at #315 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

What happened

Z.ai published a bar chart comparing Elo ratings for 10 models on October 9, 2025. It was the account's only post that day.

The numbers

The post reached 44.3K views, ranking #561 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #24 of 34 Z.ai posts. Its score of 66 ranks #315 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #17 of 34 Z.ai posts.

The lesson

At 1.59% engagement against a 0.73% median, this bar chart shows that a 10-model comparison can hold attention even when views trail the company median.

What it means

For Z.ai, the gap between #17 of 34 Z.ai posts by score and #24 of 34 by views shows engagement carrying a post whose reach sits below the company median.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

  1. Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison364.4K views
  2. LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views
  3. GLM-4.7 vs GLM-4.6 in Real-world Development Scenarios25.3K views
  4. Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v3.0338.6K views
  5. LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views
  6. LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views

Data and API

10 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 97%
SeriesGroupValueRead
Claude 4.5 (Thinking)1174printed
Claude Opus 41143printed
Claude Opus 4.1 (Thinking)1135printed
Claude Opus 4.11125printed
GPT-5 (Minimal)1111printed
Claude Sonnet 41106printed
GLM 4.61104printed
Claude 3.7 Sonnet1094printed
Claude Sonnet 4.51093printed
GLM 4.51086printed

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/2554ad30ef28.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/2554ad30ef28.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/2554ad30ef28.skill.md
Make one like thisOpen the post JSONChart data JSONSkill fileAPI docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 2554ad30ef28.

See the Max planAPI docs
PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/2554ad30ef28Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/2554ad30ef28/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/2554ad30ef28/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/2554ad30ef28/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-4

GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025
LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes
Data
GLM-4: Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison
OfficialX · Z.aiDec 8, 2025
Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison364.4K views · 1.8K likes
Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level
OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026
Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026
LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026
LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes
Data
GLM-5.1: Coding Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026
Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes
Data
GLM-5: Coding Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026
Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes
Data
GLM-5.3: LLM Performance on Harvey LAB
OfficialX · Z.aiOct 12, 2026
LLM Performance on Harvey LAB533.2K views · 6.3K likes
Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Oct 9, 2025 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.