1. Models
  2. Z.ai
  3. GLM-4.7 vs GLM-4.6 in Real-world Development Scenarios
Z.aiX · Dec 22, 2025 · official

GLM-4.7 vs GLM-4.6 in Real-world Development Scenarios

Z.ai's stacked bar chart drew 25.3K views on X: 0.1x its median post and #670 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

XDataStacked bar chartGLM-4All Z.ai modelsGLM-4.7GLM-4.6
Published by Z.ai on X, Dec 22, 2025. Source: x.com
42/ 100

ViralChart score

Small but loved

Fewer views than the median post but a higher engagement rate: a smaller crowd that acted on it.

#730 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #30 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in the Small but loved quadrant, at #730 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 25.3K views sit at 0.13x Z.ai's 201K median, ranking #29 of 34 Z.ai posts.

The 0.043% save rate lands at the 24th percentile among AI chart posts, against a 0.076% median.

On launch day this post ranked #2 of 2 from the account, with 2 posts that day.

0.1xZ.ai's median post

25.3K views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

0.15views per follower

25.3K views from an account with 165.3K followers.

bottom 24%save rate

0.043% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

2posts from Z.ai that day

Part of a run of 2 posts on Dec 22, 2025. This one was #2 of 2 by views that day.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #730 of 1,162

Views25.3K#670bottom 42%
Likes191#658bottom 43%
Engagement rate0.79%#509top 44%
Save rate0.043%#882bottom 24%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #30 of 34

Views25.3K#29bottom 16%
Likes191#28bottom 19%
Engagement rate0.79%#10top 28%
Save rate0.043%#29bottom 16%

Growth

One read so far

Views25.3K
Age at our read294 days
Views per day of life86views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Dec 22, 2025

Z.ai charts GLM-4.7 against GLM-4.6 in development scenarios

A stacked bar chart on December 22, 2025 drew 25.3K views and a 0.79% engagement rate, with saves below the AI chart median.

What happened

Z.ai posted a stacked bar chart on December 22, 2025 comparing GLM-4.7 and GLM-4.6 in real-world development scenarios. It was one of 2 posts from the account that day, alongside an LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation post.

The numbers

The post reached 25.3K views, ranking #670 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #29 of 34 Z.ai posts. Its score of 42 ranks #730 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A 0.043% save rate, at the 24th percentile among AI chart posts, trails the 0.076% median. The chart shows win, tie and lose splits for frontend and backend, with 2 models shown.

What it means

At #30 of 34 Z.ai posts by score, this chart sits below the account's own body of work. The 0.13x gap to Z.ai's 201K median views marks it as a small-reach post.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

  1. Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v3.0338.6K views
  2. LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views
  3. LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views
  4. CC-Bench: GLM-4.7 vs GLM-5 vs Claude Opus 4.542.1K views
  5. Money Balance Over Time33.2K views
  6. Coding Evaluation1.3M views

Data and API

9 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 97%
SeriesGroupValueRead
WinFrontend64.6 %printed
TieFrontend20.8 %printed
LoseFrontend14.6 %printed
WinBackend46.7 %printed
TieBackend23.3 %printed
LoseBackend30 %printed
WinInstruction following58.3 %printed
TieInstruction following16.7 %printed
LoseInstruction following25 %printed

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/a8228d83ac70.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/a8228d83ac70.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/a8228d83ac70.skill.md
Make one like thisOpen the post JSONChart data JSONSkill fileAPI docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id a8228d83ac70.

See the Max planAPI docs
PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/a8228d83ac70Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/a8228d83ac70/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/a8228d83ac70/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/a8228d83ac70/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-4

GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025
LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes
Data
GLM-4: Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison
OfficialX · Z.aiDec 8, 2025
Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison364.4K views · 1.8K likes
Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level
OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026
Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026
LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026
LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes
Data
GLM-5.1: Coding Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026
Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes
Data
GLM-5: Coding Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026
Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes
Data
GLM-5.3: LLM Performance on Harvey LAB
OfficialX · Z.aiOct 12, 2026
LLM Performance on Harvey LAB533.2K views · 6.3K likes
Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Dec 22, 2025 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.