Models
Z.ai
GLM-4.6 Agentic Coding Performance vs Competitors

Z.aiX · Sep 30, 2025 · official

GLM-4.6 Agentic Coding Performance vs Competitors

Z.ai's benchmark bar chart drew 13.7K views on X: 0.1x its median post and #774 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

GLM-4.6 wins majority against competitors in coding benchmarks

XData Benchmark bar chart GLM-4 All Z.ai models Claude Sonnet 4GLM-4.6GLM-4.5Kimi-K2-0905DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus

Z.ai: GLM-4.6 Agentic Coding Performance vs Competitors — Published by Z.ai on X, Sep 30, 2025. Source: x.com

40/ 100

ViralChart score

Small but loved

Fewer views than the median post but a higher engagement rate: a smaller crowd that acted on it.

#752 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #31 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in the Small but loved quadrant, at #752 of 1,162 AI chart posts by score.

At 13.7K views, this post sits at 0.07x Z.ai's median of 201K, ranking #31 of 34 Z.ai posts.

It was one of 3 posts from this account that day, ranking #2 of 3 by views.

Its 0.083 views per follower against 165K followers lands at the 34th percentile among posts with known followers.

0.1xZ.ai's median post

13.7K views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

0.08views per follower

13.7K views from an account with 165.3K followers.

3posts from Z.ai that day

Part of a run of 3 posts on Sep 30, 2025. This one was #2 of 3 by views that day.

0.3xthe median benchmark bar chart post

Across 215 benchmark bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 44.4K views.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #752 of 1,162

Views	13.7K	#774	bottom 33%
Likes	110	#753	bottom 35%
Engagement rate	0.89%	#400	top 34%
Save rate	0.066%	#663	bottom 43%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #31 of 34

Views	13.7K	#31	bottom 10%
Likes	110	#31	bottom 10%
Engagement rate	0.89%	#6	top 16%
Save rate	0.066%	#20	bottom 43%

Growth

One read so far

Views13.7K

Age at our read377 days

Views per day of life36views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Sep 30, 2025

Z.ai posts GLM-4.6 agentic coding benchmark bar chart

The chart shows win, tie and lose rates for GLM-4.6 against Claude Sonnet 4, with 13.7K views and a 0.89% engagement rate.

What happened

Z.ai published a benchmark bar chart on September 30, 2025, comparing GLM-4.6 against competitors on agentic coding. It was one of 3 posts from the account that day, alongside LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks and Average Token Usage per Interaction.

The numbers

The post reached 13.7K views, ranking #774 of 1,162 AI chart posts by views and #31 of 34 Z.ai posts. Its score rank is #752 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A benchmark bar chart with 5 models shown drew a 0.89% engagement rate against a 0.066% save rate. The gap between engagement and saves is where the measured weakness sits.

What it means

At #31 of 34 Z.ai posts by views, this chart sits far below the account's own median of 201K. The 0.07x ratio to that median is the gap that defines its reach.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

Data and API

12 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 97%

Series	Group	Value	Read
Win	GLM-4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4	48.6 %	printed
Tie	GLM-4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4	9.5 %	printed
Lose	GLM-4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4	41.9 %	printed
Win	GLM-4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4	50 %	printed
Tie	GLM-4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4	13.5 %	printed
Lose	GLM-4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4	36.5 %	printed
Win	GLM-4.6 vs Kimi-K2-0905	56.8 %	printed
Tie	GLM-4.6 vs Kimi-K2-0905	28.3 %	printed
Lose	GLM-4.6 vs Kimi-K2-0905	14.9 %	printed
Win	GLM-4.6 vs DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus	64.9 %	printed
Tie	GLM-4.6 vs DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus	8.1 %	printed
Lose	GLM-4.6 vs DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus	27 %	printed

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/f5bd9ccc3b91.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/f5bd9ccc3b91.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/f5bd9ccc3b91.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id f5bd9ccc3b91.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/f5bd9ccc3b91`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/f5bd9ccc3b91/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/f5bd9ccc3b91/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/f5bd9ccc3b91/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-4

GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation

OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes

Data

GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025

LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes

Data

GLM-4: Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 8, 2025

Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison364.4K views · 1.8K likes

Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level

OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026

Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026

LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026

LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026

Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026

Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiOct 12, 2026

LLM Performance on Harvey LAB533.2K views · 6.3K likes

Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Sep 30, 2025 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.