1. Models
  2. Z.ai
  3. Average Token Usage per Interaction
Z.aiX · Sep 30, 2025 · official

Average Token Usage per Interaction

Z.ai's bar chart drew 9.5K views on X: 0.0x its median post and #830 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

Average token usage per interaction across four models

XDataBar chartGLM-4All Z.ai modelsGLM-4.6GLM-4.5Kimi-K2-0905DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus
Published by Z.ai on X, Sep 30, 2025. Source: x.com
34/ 100

ViralChart score

Small but loved

Fewer views than the median post but a higher engagement rate: a smaller crowd that acted on it.

#837 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #32 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Small but loved quadrant, at #837 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 9.5K views sit at 0.05x Z.ai's 201K median, #32 of 34 Z.ai posts.

The 0.042% save rate lands at the 23rd percentile among AI chart posts, against a 0.076% median.

It was #3 of 3 Z.ai posts that day, with 3 posts from the account.

0.0xZ.ai's median post

9.5K views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

0.06views per follower

9.5K views from an account with 165.3K followers.

3posts from Z.ai that day

Part of a run of 3 posts on Sep 30, 2025. This one was #3 of 3 by views that day.

bottom 23%save rate

0.042% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #837 of 1,162

Views9.5K#830bottom 29%
Likes80#792bottom 32%
Engagement rate0.89%#403top 35%
Save rate0.042%#897bottom 23%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #32 of 34

Views9.5K#32bottom 7%
Likes80#32bottom 7%
Engagement rate0.89%#7top 19%
Save rate0.042%#30bottom 13%

Growth

One read so far

Views9.5K
Age at our read377 days
Views per day of life25views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Sep 30, 2025

Z.ai posts bar chart of average token usage per interaction

The September 30, 2025 bar chart shows average token usage per interaction across four models, with 9.5K views and a 0.89% engagement rate.

What happened

Z.ai published a bar chart on September 30, 2025, showing average token usage per interaction across four models. It came with 2 other posts from the account that day, including one on LLM performance on 8 benchmarks.

The numbers

The post reached 9.5K views, ranking #830 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #32 of 34 Z.ai posts. Its score of 34 places it at #837 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A 0.042% save rate, at the 23rd percentile among AI chart posts, trails the 0.076% median. The bar chart of average token usage per interaction drew 9.5K views, below the 39.9K median among AI chart posts.

What it means

At #32 of 34 Z.ai posts by views, this chart sits far below the account's 201K median. The 9.5K views against the 39.9K median among AI chart posts mark a wide gap for this publisher's charting.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

  1. Model Performance44.3K views
  2. Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison364.4K views
  3. LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views
  4. GLM-4.7 vs GLM-4.6 in Real-world Development Scenarios25.3K views
  5. Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v3.0338.6K views
  6. LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views

Data and API

4 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 97%
SeriesGroupValueRead
GLM-4.6651525 tokensprinted
GLM-4.5762817 tokensprinted
Kimi-K2-0905821759 tokensprinted
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus947454 tokensprinted

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/109914c8e4e9.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/109914c8e4e9.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/109914c8e4e9.skill.md
Make one like thisOpen the post JSONChart data JSONSkill fileAPI docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 109914c8e4e9.

See the Max planAPI docs
PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/109914c8e4e9Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/109914c8e4e9/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/109914c8e4e9/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/109914c8e4e9/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-4

GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025
LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes
Data
GLM-4: Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison
OfficialX · Z.aiDec 8, 2025
Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison364.4K views · 1.8K likes
Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level
OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026
Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026
LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026
LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes
Data
GLM-5.1: Coding Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026
Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes
Data
GLM-5: Coding Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026
Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes
Data
GLM-5.3: LLM Performance on Harvey LAB
OfficialX · Z.aiOct 12, 2026
LLM Performance on Harvey LAB533.2K views · 6.3K likes
Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Sep 30, 2025 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.