Models
Z.ai
CC-Bench: GLM-4.5's Experience with Agentic Coding in Real-w

Z.aiX · Sep 1, 2025 · official

CC-Bench: GLM-4.5's Experience with Agentic Coding in Real-world

Z.ai's stacked bar chart drew 32.8K views on X: 0.2x its median post and #626 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

GLM-4.5 performance against competitors in agentic coding

XData Stacked bar chart GLM-4 All Z.ai models Kimi K2 Claude Sonnet 4GLM-4.5DeepSeek-V3.1Qwen3-Coder

Z.ai: CC-Bench: GLM-4.5's Experience with Agentic Coding in Real-world — Published by Z.ai on X, Sep 1, 2025. Source: x.com

48/ 100

ViralChart score

Quiet

Fewer views and a lower engagement rate than the median post.

#646 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #28 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Quiet quadrant, with a score rank of #646 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 32.8K views are 0.16x Z.ai's company median of 201K, ranking #28 of 34 Z.ai posts.

The 0.12% save rate sits at the 70th percentile among AI chart posts, above the 0.076% median.

A score of 48 places it #646 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #28 of 34 Z.ai posts.

0.2xZ.ai's median post

32.8K views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

0.20views per follower

32.8K views from an account with 165.3K followers.

top 30%save rate

0.116% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

bottom 42%engagement rate

0.64% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #646 of 1,162

Views	32.8K	#626	bottom 46%
Likes	182	#665	bottom 43%
Engagement rate	0.64%	#672	bottom 42%
Save rate	0.116%	#348	top 30%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #28 of 34

Views	32.8K	#28	bottom 19%
Likes	182	#29	bottom 16%
Engagement rate	0.64%	#14	top 40%
Save rate	0.116%	#8	top 22%

Growth

One read so far

Views32.8K

Age at our read406 days

Views per day of life81views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Sep 1, 2025

Z.ai posts CC-Bench chart on GLM-4.5 agentic coding

The stacked bar chart shows GLM-4.5 against DeepSeek-V3.1 and Qwen3-Coder, with 32.8K views and a 0.12% save rate.

What happened

Z.ai published a stacked bar chart on September 1, 2025, titled CC-Bench: GLM-4.5's Experience with Agentic Coding in Real-world. It was the account's only post that day.

The numbers

The post reached 32.8K views, ranking #626 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #28 of 34 Z.ai posts. Its score of 48 ranks #646 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A 0.12% save rate, at the 70th percentile among AI chart posts, shows readers bookmark this stacked bar chart at a higher rate than the 0.076% median. The 5-model comparison is what gets kept.

What it means

At 0.16x Z.ai's company median of 201K views, this chart post lands below the account's typical reach. The 70th percentile save rate against the 0.076% median marks it as saved more than most AI chart posts.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

Data and API

24 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 50%

Series	Group	Value	Read
Win	GLM-4.5 vs DeepSeek-V3.1	51.9 %	printed
Tie	GLM-4.5 vs DeepSeek-V3.1	11.5 %	printed
Lose	GLM-4.5 vs DeepSeek-V3.1	36.6 %	printed
Win	GLM-4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder	80.8 %	printed
Tie	GLM-4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder	7.7 %	printed
Lose	GLM-4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder	11.5 %	printed
Win	GLM-4.5 vs Kimi K2	53.9 %	printed
Tie	GLM-4.5 vs Kimi K2	17.3 %	printed
Lose	GLM-4.5 vs Kimi K2	28.8 %	printed
Win	GLM-4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4	40.4 %	printed
Tie	GLM-4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4	9.6 %	printed
Lose	GLM-4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4	50 %	printed

Showing 12 of 24. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/57d5e46485c8.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/57d5e46485c8.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/57d5e46485c8.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 57d5e46485c8.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/57d5e46485c8`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/57d5e46485c8/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/57d5e46485c8/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/57d5e46485c8/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-4

GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation

OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes

Data

GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025

LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes

Data

GLM-4: Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 8, 2025

Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison364.4K views · 1.8K likes

Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level

OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026

Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026

LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026

LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026

Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026

Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiOct 12, 2026

LLM Performance on Harvey LAB533.2K views · 6.3K likes

Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Sep 1, 2025 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.