1. Models
  2. Z.ai
  3. Accuracy Comparison
Z.aiX · Aug 15, 2025 · official

Accuracy Comparison

Z.ai's bar chart drew 60.3K views on X: 0.3x its median post and #488 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

Accuracy Comparison of AI Models

XDataBar chartGLM-4All Z.ai modelsOC+GLM-4.5OC+Claude 4 SonetOC+Qwen-Coder-PlusCC+Claude 4 Sonet
Published by Z.ai on X, Aug 15, 2025. Source: x.com
53/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#570 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #24 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, at #570 of 1,162 AI chart posts by score.

Its 60.3K views sit at 0.30x Z.ai's 201K median, ranking #23 of 34 Z.ai posts.

The post carries 2 charts, and every chart in the post shares the post's numbers.

Its 0.56% engagement rate is 0.76x the 0.73% median among AI chart posts, at the 34th percentile.

2charts in this one post

The numbers belong to the post, so every chart in it shares them and it is ranked once.

0.3xZ.ai's median post

60.3K views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

0.37views per follower

60.3K views from an account with 165.3K followers.

2.4xthe median bar chart post

Across 241 bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 25.6K views.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #570 of 1,162

Views60.3K#488top 42%
Likes291#578top 50%
Engagement rate0.56%#762bottom 34%
Save rate0.103%#413top 35%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #24 of 34

Views60.3K#23bottom 34%
Likes291#26bottom 25%
Engagement rate0.56%#18bottom 49%
Save rate0.103%#10top 28%

Growth

One read so far

Views60.3K
Age at our read423 days
Views per day of life143views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Aug 15, 2025

Z.ai posts accuracy comparison bar chart with 2 charts

The August 15, 2025 post reached 60.3K views and a 0.56% engagement rate, landing in the Wide but thin quadrant.

What happened

Z.ai published an Accuracy Comparison bar chart on August 15, 2025, with 2 charts in the post, the other being Average Tool Usage per Interaction. It was the account's only post that day.

The numbers

It reached 60.3K views, #488 of 1,162 AI chart posts by views and #23 of 34 Z.ai posts. Its score of 53 ranks #570 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #24 of 34 Z.ai posts.

The lesson

At 0.56% engagement against a 0.73% median among AI chart posts, this 2-chart post drew 0.10% saves. The 4-model bar chart travelled on views while its engagement rate sat below the AI chart median.

What it means

At #24 of 34 Z.ai posts by score, this post sits below the account's own 201K median views at 60.3K. The 0.30x gap to that median shows the account's chart posts can reach 60.3K views without matching its typical view count.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

  1. CC-Bench: GLM-4.5's Experience with Agentic Coding in Real-world32.8K views
  2. LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views
  3. GLM-4.6 Agentic Coding Performance vs Competitors13.7K views
  4. Average Token Usage per Interaction9.5K views
  5. Model Performance44.3K views
  6. Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison364.4K views

Data and API

4 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 97%
SeriesGroupValueRead
OC+GLM-4.550 %printed
OC+Claude 4 Sonet50 %printed
OC+Qwen-Coder-Plus44 %printed
CC+Claude 4 Sonet44 %printed

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/e3f3b23f3268.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/e3f3b23f3268.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/e3f3b23f3268.skill.md
Make one like thisOpen the post JSONChart data JSONSkill fileAPI docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id e3f3b23f3268.

See the Max planAPI docs
PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/e3f3b23f3268Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/e3f3b23f3268/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/e3f3b23f3268/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/e3f3b23f3268/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-4

GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025
LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes
Data
GLM-4: Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison
OfficialX · Z.aiDec 8, 2025
Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison364.4K views · 1.8K likes
Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level
OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026
Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026
LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026
LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes
Data
GLM-5.1: Coding Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026
Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes
Data
GLM-5: Coding Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026
Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes
Data
GLM-5.3: LLM Performance on Harvey LAB
OfficialX · Z.aiOct 12, 2026
LLM Performance on Harvey LAB533.2K views · 6.3K likes
Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Aug 15, 2025 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.