Models
Z.ai
Code GLM-5.2 (Max): Head-to-Head

@arenaX · Jun 24, 2026

Code GLM-5.2 (Max): Head-to-Head

@arena's benchmark bar chart drew 89.4K views on X: 1.9x its median post and #405 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

GLM-5.2 (Max) leads in head-to-head comparisons

XData Benchmark bar chart GLM-5 All Z.ai models Claude Opus 4.6 GLM-5.1 Kimi K2.7 CodeGLM-5.2 (Max)Claude Opus 4.7 (Thinking)Claude Opus 4.8 (Thinking)Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)Seed-2.1 Pro

@arena: Code GLM-5.2 (Max): Head-to-Head — Published by @arena on X, Jun 24, 2026. Source: x.com

63/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#394 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #67 of 239 @arena posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, with a score rank of #394 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 0.12% save rate sits at the 73rd percentile among AI chart posts, 1.6x the 0.076% median.

The post reached 89.4K views, 1.9x @arena's 46.2K company median.

A score of 63 places it at #394 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #67 of 239 @arena posts.

0.38views per follower

89.4K views from an account with 234.1K followers.

top 27%save rate

0.123% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

1.9x@arena's median post

89.4K views, where @arena's typical post gets 46.2K.

2.0xthe median benchmark bar chart post

Across 215 benchmark bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 44.4K views.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 239 from @arena.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #394 of 1,162

Views	89.4K	#405	top 35%
Likes	560	#419	top 36%
Engagement rate	0.72%	#594	bottom 49%
Save rate	0.123%	#319	top 27%

Among 239 @arena posts

Score #67 of 239

Views	89.4K	#81	top 34%
Likes	560	#78	top 32%
Engagement rate	0.72%	#111	top 46%
Save rate	0.123%	#47	top 19%

Growth

One read so far

Views89.4K

Age at our read110 days

Views per day of life812views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

@arena's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Jun 24, 2026

@arena head-to-head chart for GLM-5.2 (Max) draws 89.4K views

A benchmark bar chart with 14 models reached 89.4K views and a 0.12% save rate, landing in the Wide but thin quadrant.

What happened

@arena posted a benchmark bar chart on June 24, 2026, comparing 14 models in a head-to-head for Code GLM-5.2 (Max). It was the account's only post that day.

The numbers

The post drew 89.4K views, ranking #405 of 1,162 AI chart posts by views and #81 of 239 @arena posts. Its score of 63 ranked #394 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A 14-model comparison chart earned a 0.12% save rate, 1.6x the 0.076% median among AI chart posts. The chart shows target wins of 55% for Claude Opus 4.7 (Thinking) and 42.1% for Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking).

What it means

At #67 of 239 @arena posts by score, this chart post sits above the account's typical rank. Its 0.12% save rate against a 0.72% engagement rate shows saves travel further than likes for this publisher.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what @arena posted next

Data and API

42 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 65%

Series	Group	Value	Read
Target wins	Claude Opus 4.7 (Thinking)	55 %	printed
Tie	Claude Opus 4.7 (Thinking)	25 %	printed
Opponent wins	Claude Opus 4.7 (Thinking)	20 %	printed
Target wins	Claude Opus 4.7	44.8 %	estimated
Tie	Claude Opus 4.7	20.9 %	estimated
Opponent wins	Claude Opus 4.7	34.3 %	estimated
Target wins	Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)	42.1 %	printed
Tie	Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)	36.8 %	printed
Opponent wins	Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)	21.1 %	printed
Target wins	Claude Opus 4.6	47 %	estimated
Tie	Claude Opus 4.6	10.6 %	estimated
Opponent wins	Claude Opus 4.6	42.4 %	estimated

Showing 12 of 42. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/f4a23a3706dd.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/f4a23a3706dd.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/f4a23a3706dd.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id f4a23a3706dd.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/f4a23a3706dd`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/f4a23a3706dd/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/f4a23a3706dd/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/f4a23a3706dd/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-5

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level

OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026

Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026

LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026

LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026

Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes

Data

GLM-5: Frontier models intelligence versus cost per task

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 18, 2026

Frontier models intelligence versus cost per task532.1K views · 3.8K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks253.9K views · 1.2K likes

Data

More from Z.ai

OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026

Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes

Data

GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation

OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes

Data

GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025

LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes

Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

@arena published it on Jun 24, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.