Models
Z.ai
Speed vs. Price: GLM-4.7 Providers

@ArtificialAnlysX · Jan 14, 2026

Speed vs. Price: GLM-4.7 Providers

@ArtificialAnlys's scatter plot drew 20.5K views on X: 1.8x @artificialanlys's median post and #714 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

Speed vs Price comparison for GLM-4.7 providers

XData Scatter plot GLM-4 All Z.ai modelsBasetenCerebrasDeepInfra (FP4)FireworksGMI (FP8)NovitaParasail (FP8)SiliconFlow

@ArtificialAnlys: Speed vs. Price: GLM-4.7 Providers — Published by @ArtificialAnlys on X, Jan 14, 2026. Source: x.com

59/ 100

ViralChart score

Small but loved

Fewer views than the median post but a higher engagement rate: a smaller crowd that acted on it.

#476 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #150 of 491 @artificialanlys posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It lands in Small but loved: views below the AI chart median, engagement rate at or above it, at #476 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 0.26% save rate sits at the 95th percentile among AI chart posts, 3.5x the 0.076% median.

At 20.5K views it runs 1.8x @ArtificialAnlys's 11.4K company median, ranking #210 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts by views.

A score of 59 places it #476 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #150 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts.

top 5%save rate

0.264% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

top 5%engagement rate

1.69% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

1.8x@artificialanlys's median post

20.5K views, where @artificialanlys's typical post gets 11.4K.

0.9xthe median scatter plot post

Across 187 scatter plot posts we hold, the median gets 22.4K views.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 491 from @artificialanlys.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #476 of 1,162

Views	20.5K	#714	bottom 39%
Likes	306	#563	top 48%
Engagement rate	1.69%	#57	top 5%
Save rate	0.264%	#55	top 5%

Among 491 @artificialanlys posts

Score #150 of 491

Views	20.5K	#210	top 43%
Likes	306	#165	top 34%
Engagement rate	1.69%	#25	top 5%
Save rate	0.264%	#27	top 5%

Growth

One read so far

Views20.5K

Age at our read271 days

Views per day of life76views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

@artificialanlys's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Jan 14, 2026

@ArtificialAnlys charts GLM-4.7 provider speed against price

A single scatter plot of 8 GLM-4.7 providers drew 20.5K views and a 0.26% save rate, 3.5x the AI chart median.

What happened

On January 14, 2026, @ArtificialAnlys posted one scatter plot comparing speed and price across 8 GLM-4.7 providers. It was the account's only post that day.

The numbers

The post reached 20.5K views, ranking #714 of 1,162 AI chart posts by views and #210 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts. Its score of 59 ranks #476 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A 0.26% save rate, 3.5x the 0.076% median among AI chart posts, came with a scatter plot of 8 models in a single chart. The saves sit at the 95th percentile while views rank #714 of 1,162.

What it means

For @ArtificialAnlys, this post's 20.5K views run 1.8x its own 11.4K median, yet its score rank of #476 of 1,162 AI chart posts trails its #150 of 491 account rank.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what @artificialanlys posted next

Data and API

8 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 36%

Group	Value	Read
Cerebras	1400 tokens/s	estimated
SiliconFlow	400 tokens/s	estimated
Fireworks	300 tokens/s	estimated
Baseten	280 tokens/s	estimated
DeepInfra (FP4)	200 tokens/s	estimated
GMI (FP8)	180 tokens/s	estimated
Parasail (FP8)	150 tokens/s	estimated
Novita	100 tokens/s	estimated

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/ca6e03644a63.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/ca6e03644a63.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/ca6e03644a63.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id ca6e03644a63.

Approximate values. Our two readings of this chart agreed only in part (confidence 0.36 of 1), so check the original before you quote a number. The API marks it lowConfidence, and ?min_confidence=0.5 leaves it out.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/ca6e03644a63`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/ca6e03644a63/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/ca6e03644a63/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/ca6e03644a63/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GLM-4

GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation

OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 22, 2025

LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.4M views · 3.3K likes

Data

GLM-4: LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiJul 28, 2025

LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views · 3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiSep 30, 2025

LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks907.8K views · 1.8K likes

Data

GLM-4: Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison

OfficialX · Z.aiDec 8, 2025

Open-source LLMs Benchmarks Comparison364.4K views · 1.8K likes

Data

More from Z.ai

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level

OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026

Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026

LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes

Data

GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks

OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026

LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026

Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiMar 27, 2026

Coding Evaluation1.3M views · 5.4K likes

Data

OfficialX · Z.aiOct 12, 2026

LLM Performance on Harvey LAB533.2K views · 6.3K likes

Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

@ArtificialAnlys published it on Jan 14, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.