Models
Anthropic
AI Model Benchmark Comparison

AnthropicX · Jul 24, 2026 · official

AI Model Benchmark Comparison

Anthropic's table chart drew 5.8M views on X: 14x its median post and #27 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

Opus 5 leads in most AI benchmarks

XData Table chart Claude Fable 5 All Anthropic modelsOpus 5Fable 5Opus 4.8GPT-5.6 Sol

Anthropic: AI Model Benchmark Comparison — Published by Anthropic on X, Jul 24, 2026. Source: x.com

71/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#195 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #24 of 56 Anthropic posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, at #195 of 1,162 AI chart posts by score.

At 5.8M views, this post runs 14x Anthropic's median of 431K, ranking #5 of 56 Anthropic posts by views.

Its 0.23% engagement rate sits at the 6th percentile among AI chart posts, in the bottom decile, against a 0.73% median.

With 1.9M followers, 3.07 views per follower lands in the top decile, the 90th percentile, against a 0.20 median.

44xthe median table chart post

Across 95 table chart posts we hold, the median gets 133.2K views.

14xAnthropic's median post

5.8M views, where Anthropic's typical post gets 431K.

bottom 6%engagement rate

0.23% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

bottom 11%save rate

0.023% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 56 from Anthropic.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #195 of 1,162

Views	5.8M	#27	top 2%
Likes	10.7K	#27	top 2%
Engagement rate	0.23%	#1,097	bottom 6%
Save rate	0.023%	#1,030	bottom 11%

Among 56 Anthropic posts

Score #24 of 56

Views	5.8M	#5	top 8%
Likes	10.7K	#8	top 13%
Engagement rate	0.23%	#54	bottom 4%
Save rate	0.023%	#51	bottom 10%

Growth

Our reads cover 27 hours

Views5.8M

Age at our read81 days

Views per day of life71.9Kviews divided by days since it was posted

Gained between our reads+408views over 27 hours, about 365 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Anthropic's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Jul 24, 2026 · Lead story

Anthropic posts Opus 5 benchmark table chart

The table chart drew 5.8M views but a 0.23% engagement rate, landing in the Wide but thin quadrant.

What happened

Anthropic posted a table chart on July 24, 2026, comparing 4 models across AI benchmarks. It was one of 5 posts from the account that day, alongside posts on novel problem-solving by cost, agentic computer use performance by effort level, and vulnerability identification and exploitation in open-source code.

The numbers

The post reached 5.8M views, #27 of 1,162 AI chart posts by views and #5 of 56 Anthropic posts. Its score of 71 ranks #195 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A table chart with 4 models shown drew a 0.23% engagement rate, below the 0.73% median among AI chart posts. The 5.8M views came with a 0.023% save rate.

What it means

At #24 of 56 Anthropic posts by score, this chart sits below the account's own median engagement of 0.56%. The 5.8M views against a 0.23% engagement rate show a wide but thin result.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Anthropic posted next

Data and API

51 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 54%

Series	Group	Value	Read
Opus 5	Agentic terminal coding Frontier-Bench v0.1	43.3 %	printed
Fable 5	Agentic terminal coding Frontier-Bench v0.1	33.7 %	printed
Opus 4.8	Agentic terminal coding Frontier-Bench v0.1	21.1 %	printed
GPT-5.6 Sol	Agentic terminal coding Frontier-Bench v0.1	34.4 %	printed
Opus 5	Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2	1861 %	printed
Fable 5	Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2	1747 %	printed
Opus 4.8	Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2	1593 %	printed
GPT-5.6 Sol	Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2	1736 %	printed
Opus 5	Novel problem-solving ARC-AGI-3	30.2 %	printed
Opus 4.8	Novel problem-solving ARC-AGI-3	1.5 %	printed
GPT-5.6 Sol	Novel problem-solving ARC-AGI-3	7.8 %	printed
Opus 5	Agentic search BrowseComp	90.8 %	printed

Showing 12 of 51. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/d15ae2ff46e1.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/d15ae2ff46e1.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/d15ae2ff46e1.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id d15ae2ff46e1.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/d15ae2ff46e1`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/d15ae2ff46e1/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/d15ae2ff46e1/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/d15ae2ff46e1/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5: Claude Mythos 5 and Fable 5 Benchmark Comparison

OfficialX · AnthropicJun 9, 2026

Claude Mythos 5 and Fable 5 Benchmark Comparison6.3M views · 15.4K likes