1. Models
  2. Anthropic
  3. Claude Fable 5.1 Benchmark Comparison
AnthropicX · Sep 1, 2026 · official

Claude Fable 5.1 Benchmark Comparison

Anthropic's table chart drew 1.2M views on X: 2.8x its median post and #96 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

Claude Fable 5.1 performance across multiple benchmarks

XDataTable chartClaude Fable 5All Anthropic modelsFable 5.1Fable 5Opus 5GPT-5.6 Sol
Published by Anthropic on X, Sep 1, 2026. Source: x.com
75/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#115 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #15 of 56 Anthropic posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, with a score rank of #115 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its score of 75 ranks #115 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #15 of 56 Anthropic posts.

The 1.2M views are 2.8x Anthropic's 431K median, ranking #19 of 56 Anthropic posts.

On September 1, 2026 it ranked #1 of 3 posts from this account that day.

8.9xthe median table chart post

Across 95 table chart posts we hold, the median gets 133.2K views.

2.8xAnthropic's median post

1.2M views, where Anthropic's typical post gets 431K.

3posts from Anthropic that day

Part of a run of 3 posts on Sep 1, 2026. This one was #1 of 3 by views that day.

bottom 32%save rate

0.052% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 56 from Anthropic.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #115 of 1,162

Views1.2M#96top 8%
Likes5.5K#57top 5%
Engagement rate0.54%#784bottom 33%
Save rate0.052%#792bottom 32%

Among 56 Anthropic posts

Score #15 of 56

Views1.2M#19top 33%
Likes5.5K#15top 26%
Engagement rate0.54%#30bottom 47%
Save rate0.052%#30bottom 47%

Growth

Our reads cover 27 hours

Views1.2M
Age at our read42 days
Views per day of life28.2Kviews divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+113views over 27 hours, about 100 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Anthropic's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Sep 1, 2026

Anthropic posts Claude Fable 5.1 benchmark comparison table

A table chart of Claude Fable 5.1 across benchmarks drew 1.2M views and a 0.54% engagement rate.

What happened

Anthropic published a table chart on September 1, 2026 comparing Claude Fable 5.1 performance across multiple benchmarks. That day the account posted 3 times, including Indexed cost of Fable usage and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1: Accuracy vs Cost.

The numbers

The post reached 1.2M views, ranking #96 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #19 of 56 Anthropic posts. Its score of 75 ranks #115 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A table chart with 4 models shown drew 1.2M views against a 39.9K median among AI chart posts, but a 0.052% save rate. The reach is wide while the engagement rate of 0.54% sits below the AI chart median.

What it means

At #15 of 56 Anthropic posts by score, this chart sits above the account's own median performance. The 2.8x gap over Anthropic's 431K median views shows the reach, while the 0.54% engagement rate marks the thin side.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Data and API

53 points read off this chart

Partly publisher's numbers 62%
SeriesGroupValueRead
Fable 5.1Agentic scientific research52.6printed
Fable 5Agentic scientific research24.7printed
Opus 5Agentic scientific research29printed
GPT-5.6 SolAgentic scientific research22.4printed
Fable 5.1Terminal-Bench-Science 0.160.9printed
Fable 5Terminal-Bench-Science 0.142printed
Opus 5Terminal-Bench-Science 0.152.3printed
GPT-5.6 SolTerminal-Bench-Science 0.137.3printed
Fable 5.1Agentic coding55.8printed
Fable 5Agentic coding42printed
Opus 5Agentic coding52.3printed
GPT-5.6 SolAgentic coding37.3printed

Showing 12 of 53. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/9925c28e11df.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/9925c28e11df.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/9925c28e11df.skill.md

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 9925c28e11df.

PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/9925c28e11dfTitle, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/9925c28e11df/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/9925c28e11df/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/9925c28e11df/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about Claude Fable 5

More from Anthropic

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Anthropic published it on Sep 1, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.