1. Models
  2. Anthropic
  3. Opus 4.7 Benchmark Comparison
AnthropicX · Apr 16, 2026 · official

Opus 4.7 Benchmark Comparison

Anthropic's table chart drew 14.1M views on X: 33x its median post and #7 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

Opus 4.7 benchmark performance comparison

XDataTable chartClaude MythosAll Anthropic modelsGPT-5.4Gemini 3.1 ProOpus 4.7Opus 4.6Mythos 77.8
Published by Anthropic on X, Apr 16, 2026. Source: x.com
85/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#6 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #1 of 56 Anthropic posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, at #6 of 1,162 AI chart posts by score.

Its 14.1M views sit 33x above Anthropic's median post of 431K, the #2 of 56 Anthropic posts by views.

A score of 85 places it #6 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #1 of 56 Anthropic posts.

At 7.41 views per follower against a 0.20 median, it lands in the 95th percentile, the top decile.

33xAnthropic's median post

14.1M views, where Anthropic's typical post gets 431K.

106xthe median table chart post

Across 95 table chart posts we hold, the median gets 133.2K views.

7.40views per follower

14.1M views from an account with 1.9M followers.

top 47%save rate

0.082% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 56 from Anthropic.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #6 of 1,162

Views14.1M#7top 1%
Likes79.6K#1top 1%
Engagement rate0.72%#598bottom 49%
Save rate0.082%#551top 47%

Among 56 Anthropic posts

Score #1 of 56

Views14.1M#2top 3%
Likes79.6K#1top 1%
Engagement rate0.72%#19top 33%
Save rate0.082%#8top 13%

Growth

Our reads cover 22 hours

Views14.1M
Age at our read180 days
Views per day of life78.1Kviews divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+349views over 22 hours, about 389 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Anthropic's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Apr 16, 2026 · Lead story

Anthropic's Opus 4.7 benchmark table reaches 14.1M views

The table chart drew 14.1M views and a 0.72% engagement rate, landing in the Wide but thin quadrant.

What happened

Anthropic posted a table chart on April 16, 2026 comparing Opus 4.7 benchmark performance. It was the account's only post that day.

The numbers

It reached 14.1M views, #7 of 1,162 AI chart posts by views and #2 of 56 Anthropic posts. Its score of 85 ranks #6 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A table chart with 5 models shown drew 14.1M views, 33x Anthropic's median post, but its 0.72% engagement rate sits below the AI chart median.

What it means

At #1 of 56 Anthropic posts by score, this is the account's top chart post, yet its 0.72% engagement rate against 14.1M views shows wide but thin reach.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Anthropic posted next

  1. Sycophancy by model63.7K views
  2. Opus 4.8 benchmark comparison15.5M views
  3. Claude model performance in research sessions416K views
  4. Claude Mythos 5 and Fable 5 Benchmark Comparison6.3M views
  5. Work session changes over seven months75.2K views
  6. Coding success by occupation62.2K views

Data and API

64 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 77%
SeriesGroupValueRead
Opus 4.7Agentic coding SWE-bench Pro64.3 %printed
Opus 4.6Agentic coding SWE-bench Pro53.4 %printed
GPT-5.4Agentic coding SWE-bench Pro57.7 %printed
Gemini 3.1 ProAgentic coding SWE-bench Pro54.2 %printed
Mythos PreviewAgentic coding SWE-bench Pro77.8 %printed
Opus 4.7Agentic coding SWE-bench Verified87.6 %printed
Opus 4.6Agentic coding SWE-bench Verified80.8 %printed
Gemini 3.1 ProAgentic coding SWE-bench Verified80.6 %printed
Mythos PreviewAgentic coding SWE-bench Verified93.9 %printed
Opus 4.7Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.069.4 %printed
Opus 4.6Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.065.4 %printed
GPT-5.4Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.075.1 %printed

Showing 12 of 64. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/b33c305ccdb8.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/b33c305ccdb8.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/b33c305ccdb8.skill.md
Make one like thisOpen the post JSONChart data JSONSkill fileAPI docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id b33c305ccdb8.

See the Max planAPI docs
PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/b33c305ccdb8Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/b33c305ccdb8/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/b33c305ccdb8/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/b33c305ccdb8/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about Claude Mythos

Claude Mythos: Vulnerability identification and exploitation in open-source code
OfficialX · AnthropicJul 24, 2026
Vulnerability identification and exploitation in open-source code669.1K views · 2.7K likes
Data
Claude Mythos: Misaligned behavior
OfficialX · AnthropicJul 24, 2026
Misaligned behavior518.2K views · 2.4K likes
Data
Claude Mythos: Claude model performance in research sessions
OfficialX · AnthropicJun 4, 2026
Claude model performance in research sessions416K views · 1.6K likes
Data
Claude Mythos: Sycophancy by model
OfficialX · AnthropicApr 30, 2026
Sycophancy by model63.7K views · 170 likes
Data
Claude Mythos: Misaligned behavior
OfficialBlog · AnthropicJun 30, 2026
Misaligned behavior
Claude Mythos: Firefox 147 exploit development
OfficialBlog · AnthropicJun 30, 2026
Firefox 147 exploit development

More from Anthropic

Anthropic stacked bar chart: Firefox Security Vulnerabilities4.7x
Anthropic·Mar 2026
Firefox Security Vulnerabilities
3.2M views14.8K likes0.5% eng.
Data
Anthropic line chart: US GDP AI scenarios0.4x
Anthropic·Sep 2026
US GDP AI scenarios
856.3K views1.2K likes0.2% eng.
Data
Anthropic bar chart: RL reward hacking risks1.0x
Anthropic·Sep 2026
RL reward hacking risks
806.5K views3.2K likes0.5% eng.
Data
Claude Opus 4: Opus 4.8 benchmark comparison
OfficialX · AnthropicMay 28, 2026
Opus 4.8 benchmark comparison15.5M views · 66.3K likes
Data
Claude agents and computer use: AI Model Benchmark Comparison
OfficialX · AnthropicNov 24, 2025
AI Model Benchmark Comparison7.8M views · 18.8K likes
Data
Claude Fable 5: Claude Mythos 5 and Fable 5 Benchmark Comparison
OfficialX · AnthropicJun 9, 2026
Claude Mythos 5 and Fable 5 Benchmark Comparison6.3M views · 15.4K likes
Data
Claude Fable 5: AI Model Benchmark Comparison
OfficialX · AnthropicJul 24, 2026
AI Model Benchmark Comparison5.8M views · 10.7K likes
Data
Claude Opus 4.6: Long context MRCR v2 retrieval
OfficialX · AnthropicMar 13, 2026
Long context MRCR v2 retrieval5.7M views · 24.6K likes
Data
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Claude 4 benchmarks
OfficialX · AnthropicMay 22, 2025
Claude 4 benchmarks4.3M views · 20.5K likes
Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Anthropic published it on Apr 16, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.