1. Models
  2. Anthropic
  3. AI Model Benchmark Comparison
AnthropicX · Nov 24, 2025 · official

AI Model Benchmark Comparison

Anthropic's table chart drew 7.8M views on X: 18x its median post and #16 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

Model performance across multiple benchmarks

Published by Anthropic on X, Nov 24, 2025. Source: x.com
74/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#130 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #17 of 56 Anthropic posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, at #130 of 1,162 AI chart posts by score.

Its 7.8M views are 18x Anthropic's 431K median, ranking #3 of 56 Anthropic posts.

At 4.12 views per follower against a 0.20 median, it sits in the 92nd percentile.

Engagement lands at 0.31%, 0.42x the 0.73% median among AI chart posts.

18xAnthropic's median post

7.8M views, where Anthropic's typical post gets 431K.

59xthe median table chart post

Across 95 table chart posts we hold, the median gets 133.2K views.

bottom 10%engagement rate

0.31% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

4.11views per follower

7.8M views from an account with 1.9M followers.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 56 from Anthropic.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #130 of 1,162

Views7.8M#16top 1%
Likes18.8K#16top 1%
Engagement rate0.31%#1,048bottom 10%
Save rate0.040%#911bottom 22%

Among 56 Anthropic posts

Score #17 of 56

Views7.8M#3top 4%
Likes18.8K#5top 8%
Engagement rate0.31%#51bottom 10%
Save rate0.040%#39bottom 31%

Growth

Our reads cover 22 hours

Views7.8M
Age at our read323 days
Views per day of life24.2Kviews divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+133views over 22 hours, about 148 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Anthropic's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Nov 24, 2025 · Lead story

Anthropic's benchmark table chart draws 7.8M views

A table chart of model performance across benchmarks reached 7.8M views on November 24, 2025, with engagement at 0.31%.

What happened

Anthropic posted a table chart on November 24, 2025, covering model performance across multiple benchmarks. The account posted 2 items that day, including one on Software engineering SWE-bench Verified with 2M views.

The numbers

The post reached 7.8M views, #16 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #3 of 56 Anthropic posts. Its score of 74 ranks #130 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #17 of 56 Anthropic posts.

The lesson

A table chart with 5 models shown drew 7.8M views, 18x Anthropic's 431K median, but a 0.040% save rate and 0.31% engagement put it in the bottom decile. Wide reach and low saves can sit in the same post.

What it means

For Anthropic, 7.8M views against a 431K median is 18x, yet engagement at 0.31% is 0.42x the AI chart median. The gap between #3 of 56 Anthropic posts by views and #17 of 56 by score is the measured spread.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Data and API

46 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 59%
SeriesGroupValueRead
Opus 4.5Agentic coding (SWE-bench Verified)80.9 %printed
Sonnet 4.5Agentic coding (SWE-bench Verified)77.2 %printed
Gemini 3 ProAgentic coding (SWE-bench Verified)76.3 %printed
Opus 4.5Agentic terminal (Terminal-bench 2.0)59.3 %printed
Sonnet 4.5Agentic terminal (Terminal-bench 2.0)50 %printed
Opus 4.5Agentic tool use (T2-bench)88.9 %printed
Sonnet 4.5Agentic tool use (T2-bench)86.2 %printed
Opus 4.1Agentic tool use (T2-bench)86.8 %printed
Gemini 3 ProAgentic tool use (T2-bench)85.3 %printed
Opus 4.5Scaled tool use (MCP Atlas)98.2 %printed
Sonnet 4.5Scaled tool use (MCP Atlas)98 %printed
Opus 4.1Scaled tool use (MCP Atlas)71.5 %printed

Showing 12 of 46. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/160d2b2704d9.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/160d2b2704d9.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/160d2b2704d9.skill.md

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 160d2b2704d9.

PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/160d2b2704d9Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/160d2b2704d9/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/160d2b2704d9/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/160d2b2704d9/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about Claude agents and computer use

More from Anthropic

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Anthropic published it on Nov 24, 2025 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.