1. Models
  2. Z.ai
  3. AutoGLM Success Rates on Chinese Apps
Z.aiX · Nov 6, 2024 · official

AutoGLM Success Rates on Chinese Apps

Z.ai's stacked bar chart drew 687 views on X: 0.0x its median post and #1,142 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

Human evaluated success rates of AutoGLM on Chinese apps

XDataStacked bar chartGLM-5V and GLM-V vision modelsAll Z.ai modelsAutoGLM
Published by Z.ai on X, Nov 6, 2024. Source: x.com
4/ 100

ViralChart score

Quiet

Fewer views and a lower engagement rate than the median post.

#1,162 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #34 of 34 Z.ai posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Quiet quadrant, at #1,162 of 1,162 AI chart posts by score.

Its 687 views sit at 0.00x Z.ai's 201K median, ranking #33 of 34 Z.ai posts by views.

The score of 4 places it #1,162 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #34 of 34 Z.ai posts.

At 0.004 views per follower against a 0.20 median, it lands in the 1st percentile and bottom decile.

0.0xZ.ai's median post

687 views, where Z.ai's typical post gets 201.2K.

0.00views per follower

687 views from an account with 165.3K followers.

0.0xthe median stacked bar chart post

Across 15 stacked bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 32.8K views.

bottom 2%save rate

0.000% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 34 from Z.ai.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #1,162 of 1,162

Views687#1,142bottom 2%
Likes3#1,160bottom 1%
Engagement rate0.44%#909bottom 22%
Save rate0.000%#1,117bottom 2%

Among 34 Z.ai posts

Score #34 of 34

Views687#33bottom 4%
Likes3#33bottom 4%
Engagement rate0.44%#26bottom 25%
Save rate0.000%#33bottom 3%

Growth

One read so far

Views687
Age at our read706 days
Views per day of life1views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Z.ai's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Nov 6, 2024

Z.ai posts AutoGLM success rates on Chinese apps

A stacked bar chart of AutoGLM success rates drew 687 views and a 0.44% engagement rate, below the AI chart median on both.

What happened

Z.ai posted a stacked bar chart on November 6, 2024, showing AutoGLM success rates on Chinese apps. It was the account's only post that day.

The numbers

It reached 687 views, ranking #1,142 of 1,162 AI chart posts, and scored 4, ranking #1,162 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A single-model stacked bar chart with a 0.000% save rate and 687 views shows what readers did not keep. The 0.44% engagement rate against a 39.9K median for all AI chart posts marks the gap.

What it means

At #34 of 34 Z.ai posts and 687 views against a 201K company median, this chart post sits at the bottom of the account's range. The 0.02x ratio to the 0.20 median views per follower leaves it in the 1st percentile.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Z.ai posted next

  1. LLM Performance Evaluation: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding Benchmarks1.3M views
  2. AI Model Performance vs Parameters20.9K views
  3. GLM-4.5's Experience with Agentic Coding in Real-world Development38K views
  4. GLM-4.5 ARC Benchmark Performance153.3K views
  5. Open-source LLMs Benchmarks299.8K views
  6. Accuracy Comparison60.3K views

Data and API

21 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 96%
SeriesGroupValueRead
SuccessWeChat92 %printed
PartialWeChat4 %printed
FailWeChat4 %estimated
SuccessMeituan70 %printed
PartialMeituan30 %printed
FailMeituan0 %printed
SuccessTaobao93 %printed
PartialTaobao7 %printed
FailTaobao0 %printed
SuccessDianping100 %printed
PartialDianping0 %printed
FailDianping0 %printed

Showing 12 of 21. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/a239a2b0de9a.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/a239a2b0de9a.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/a239a2b0de9a.skill.md
Make one like thisOpen the post JSONChart data JSONSkill fileAPI docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id a239a2b0de9a.

See the Max planAPI docs
PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/a239a2b0de9aTitle, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/a239a2b0de9a/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/a239a2b0de9a/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/a239a2b0de9a/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More from Z.ai

GLM-5: Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level
OfficialX · Z.aiJun 16, 2026
Agentic Coding Performance by Effort Level7.7M views · 13.1K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM performance across six benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 26, 2026
LLM performance across six benchmarks7M views · 23.8K likes
Data
GLM-5: LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks
OfficialX · Z.aiAug 14, 2026
LLM benchmark performance across nine tasks5.9M views · 19.3K likes
Data
GLM-5.1: Coding Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiApr 7, 2026
Coding Performance Evaluation4.4M views · 10.7K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation
OfficialX · Z.aiJan 19, 2026
LLM Benchmarks Performance Evaluation1.7M views · 5.3K likes
Data
GLM-4: LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks
OfficialX · Z.aiFeb 11, 2026
LLM Performance on 8 Benchmarks1.5M views · 5.3K likes
Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Z.ai published it on Nov 6, 2024 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.