1. Models
  2. Anthropic
  3. AI Model Benchmarks: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
A
@ArtificialAnlysX · Jul 8, 2026

AI Model Benchmarks: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index &

@ArtificialAnlys's bar chart drew 2M views on X: 175x @artificialanlys's median post and #62 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

AI model benchmark comparison across multiple indices

XDataBar chartClaude Fable 5All Anthropic modelsClaudeGPTGeminiGrokDeepSeekQwen
Published by @ArtificialAnlys on X, Jul 8, 2026. Source: x.com
65/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#339 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #99 of 491 @artificialanlys posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, at #339 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 2M views sit 175x @ArtificialAnlys's median post, ranking #10 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts.

Engagement lands at 0.12%, 0.16x the AI chart median and 2nd percentile among AI chart posts.

The post ranked #1 of 5 @ArtificialAnlys posts that day, ahead of 4 others.

175x@artificialanlys's median post

2M views, where @artificialanlys's typical post gets 11.4K.

78xthe median bar chart post

Across 241 bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 25.6K views.

bottom 2%engagement rate

0.12% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

bottom 7%save rate

0.014% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 491 from @artificialanlys.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #339 of 1,162

Views2M#62top 5%
Likes1.8K#173top 15%
Engagement rate0.12%#1,137bottom 2%
Save rate0.014%#1,083bottom 7%

Among 491 @artificialanlys posts

Score #99 of 491

Views2M#10top 2%
Likes1.8K#30top 6%
Engagement rate0.12%#482bottom 2%
Save rate0.014%#447bottom 9%

Growth

Our reads cover 27 hours

Views2M
Age at our read97 days
Views per day of life20.6Kviews divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+66views over 27 hours, about 59 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

@artificialanlys's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Jul 8, 2026

@ArtificialAnlys posts AI model benchmark bar chart

A 6-model bar chart drew 2M views but 0.12% engagement, landing in the Wide but thin quadrant.

What happened

@ArtificialAnlys published a bar chart on July 8, 2026 comparing AI models across benchmark indices. It was one of 5 posts from the account that day, alongside 4 others.

The numbers

The post reached 2M views, ranking #62 of 1,162 AI chart posts by views and #10 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts. Its score rank is #339 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A 6-model bar chart drew 2M views but a 0.12% engagement rate, 0.16x the AI chart median. The chart shows printed values from 51 to 60 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.

What it means

At #99 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts by score, this chart's 2M views came with 0.12% engagement, below the account's own 0.82% median.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what @artificialanlys posted next

  1. Cost per Intelligence Index Task48.7K views
  2. Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index41.6K views
  3. AI Coding Agent Cost vs Performance442.3K views
  4. Success Rate by Domain for EnterpriseOps-Gym4.1K views
  5. EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA score vs. Cost per Task3.7K views
  6. AA-Briefcase Elo vs. Cost per Task1.4M views

Data and API

30 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 63%
SeriesGroupValueRead
Claude Opus 4.5 (high)Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.160printed
Claude Opus 4.5 (with failback)Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.156printed
GPT-5.2 (high)Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.155printed
Grok 4.5 (high)Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.154printed
Claude Opus 4.5 (medium)Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.154.5printed
Gemini 3.1 Pro (high)Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.151printed
Grok 4.5 (medium)Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.150printed
Gemini 3.1 Pro (medium)Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.146printed
GPT-5.2 (medium)Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.145.5printed
OpenAI o3 Pro (high)Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.144printed
OpenAI o3 Pro (medium)Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.144printed
MiniMax M2.1 (high)Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.144printed

Showing 12 of 30. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/6a1d9105c6c9.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/6a1d9105c6c9.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/6a1d9105c6c9.skill.md
Make one like thisOpen the post JSONChart data JSONSkill fileAPI docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 6a1d9105c6c9.

See the Max planAPI docs
PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/6a1d9105c6c9Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/6a1d9105c6c9/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/6a1d9105c6c9/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/6a1d9105c6c9/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5: Claude Mythos 5 and Fable 5 Benchmark Comparison
OfficialX · AnthropicJun 9, 2026
Claude Mythos 5 and Fable 5 Benchmark Comparison6.3M views · 15.4K likes
Data
Claude Fable 5: AI Model Benchmark Comparison
OfficialX · AnthropicJul 24, 2026
AI Model Benchmark Comparison5.8M views · 10.7K likes
Data
Claude Fable 5: Real-world knowledge GDPval-AA tasks by effort level
OfficialX · AnthropicSep 22, 2026
Real-world knowledge GDPval-AA tasks by effort level1.5M views · 3.6K likes
Data
Claude Fable 5: Agentic terminal coding by effort level
OfficialX · AnthropicSep 22, 2026
Agentic terminal coding by effort level1.5M views · 3.6K likes
Data
Claude Fable 5: Agentic business automation workflows by effort
OfficialX · AnthropicJul 24, 2026
Agentic business automation workflows by effort1.4M views · 4K likes
Data
Claude Fable 5: Agentic computer use performance by effort level
OfficialX · AnthropicJul 24, 2026
Agentic computer use performance by effort level1.4M views · 4K likes
Data

More from Anthropic

Anthropic stacked bar chart: Firefox Security Vulnerabilities4.7x
Anthropic·Mar 2026
Firefox Security Vulnerabilities
3.2M views14.8K likes0.5% eng.
Data
Anthropic line chart: US GDP AI scenarios0.4x
Anthropic·Sep 2026
US GDP AI scenarios
856.3K views1.2K likes0.2% eng.
Data
Anthropic bar chart: RL reward hacking risks1.0x
Anthropic·Sep 2026
RL reward hacking risks
806.5K views3.2K likes0.5% eng.
Data
Claude Opus 4: Opus 4.8 benchmark comparison
OfficialX · AnthropicMay 28, 2026
Opus 4.8 benchmark comparison15.5M views · 66.3K likes
Data
Claude Mythos: Opus 4.7 Benchmark Comparison
OfficialX · AnthropicApr 16, 2026
Opus 4.7 Benchmark Comparison14.1M views · 79.6K likes
Data
Claude agents and computer use: AI Model Benchmark Comparison
OfficialX · AnthropicNov 24, 2025
AI Model Benchmark Comparison7.8M views · 18.8K likes
Data
Claude Opus 4.6: Long context MRCR v2 retrieval
OfficialX · AnthropicMar 13, 2026
Long context MRCR v2 retrieval5.7M views · 24.6K likes
Data
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Claude 4 benchmarks
OfficialX · AnthropicMay 22, 2025
Claude 4 benchmarks4.3M views · 20.5K likes
Data
Claude Opus 4: Software Engineering Benchmark Comparison
OfficialX · AnthropicAug 5, 2025
Software Engineering Benchmark Comparison4.1M views · 10K likes
Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

@ArtificialAnlys published it on Jul 8, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.