Models
Anthropic
CritPt Benchmark Leaderboard: Score

@ArtificialAnlysX · Jun 17, 2026

CritPt Benchmark Leaderboard: Score

@ArtificialAnlys's leaderboard drew 41.9K views on X: 3.7x @artificialanlys's median post and #570 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

CritPt benchmark leaderboard scores for AI reasoning models

XData Leaderboard Claude Opus 4 All Anthropic models Muse SparkGPT-5.5 Pro (high)Claude Faible 5 (with fallback)GPT-5.5 (high)Claude Opus 4.6 (max)GLM-5.2 (max)Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.7 Max

@ArtificialAnlys: CritPt Benchmark Leaderboard: Score — Published by @ArtificialAnlys on X, Jun 17, 2026. Source: x.com

68/ 100

ViralChart score

Reached and resonated

More views and a higher engagement rate than the median post: it travelled and people acted on it.

#283 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #80 of 491 @artificialanlys posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Reached and resonated quadrant, with a score rank of #283 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 1.69% engagement rate sits at the 95th percentile among AI chart posts, against a 0.73% median.

The post drew 41.9K views against a 11.4K median for @ArtificialAnlys posts, a 3.7x ratio.

A score of 68 places it at #283 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #80 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts.

top 5%engagement rate

1.69% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

3.7x@artificialanlys's median post

41.9K views, where @artificialanlys's typical post gets 11.4K.

top 13%save rate

0.177% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

4posts from @artificialanlys that day

Part of a run of 4 posts on Jun 17, 2026. This one was #2 of 4 by views that day.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 491 from @artificialanlys.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #283 of 1,162

Views	41.9K	#570	top 49%
Likes	649	#371	top 32%
Engagement rate	1.69%	#54	top 5%
Save rate	0.177%	#153	top 13%

Among 491 @artificialanlys posts

Score #80 of 491

Views	41.9K	#158	top 32%
Likes	649	#100	top 20%
Engagement rate	1.69%	#23	top 5%
Save rate	0.177%	#77	top 16%

Growth

One read so far

Views41.9K

Age at our read117 days

Views per day of life358views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

@artificialanlys's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Jun 17, 2026

@ArtificialAnlys posts CritPt Benchmark leaderboard for AI reasoning models

The leaderboard drew 41.9K views and a 1.69% engagement rate, landing in the Reached and resonated quadrant.

What happened

@ArtificialAnlys published a CritPt Benchmark leaderboard chart on June 17, 2026. It was one of 4 posts from the account that day, alongside 3 others including an AI Intelligence Index vs Cost chart with 344K views.

The numbers

The post reached 41.9K views, ranking #570 of 1,162 AI chart posts by views. Its score of 68 ranks #283 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #80 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts.

The lesson

A leaderboard with 22 models shown drew a 1.69% engagement rate, above the 0.73% median among AI chart posts. The chart shows scores from 30.6% to 13.4% across the printed values.

What it means

At #80 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts by score, this leaderboard sits above the account's 0.82% median engagement rate. The 3.7x views ratio against the account's 11.4K median shows wide reach for this chart type.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what @artificialanlys posted next

Data and API

35 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 66%

Group	Value	Read
GPT-5.5 Pro (high)	30.6 %	printed
Claude Faile 5 (with reasoning)	28.6 %	estimated
GPT-5.5 (high)	27.1 %	printed
Claude Opus 4.5 (max)	20.9 %	printed
GLM-5.2 (max)	20.9 %	printed
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	17.7 %	printed
Owen3.7 Max	13.4 %	printed
Gemini 3.5 Flash	13.1 %	estimated
DeepSeek V4 Pro Preview	12.9 %	printed
Muse Spark	11.3 %	printed
Grok 4.3 (high)	8 %	printed
Kim K2.6	8 %	estimated

Showing 12 of 35. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/0ce9866e015c.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/0ce9866e015c.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/0ce9866e015c.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 0ce9866e015c.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/0ce9866e015c`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/0ce9866e015c/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/0ce9866e015c/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/0ce9866e015c/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.