1. Models
  2. OpenAI
  3. FrontierScience-Olympiad accuracy across models
OpenAIX · Dec 16, 2025 · official

FrontierScience-Olympiad accuracy across models

OpenAI's bar chart drew 608.9K views on X: 3.8x its median post and #137 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

AI model accuracy comparison on FrontierScience Olympiad

XDataBar chartGPT-4oAll OpenAI modelsGrok 4Gemini 3 ProOpenAI o1OpenAI o4-miniOpenAI o3Claude Opus 4.5GPT-5.2
Published by OpenAI on X, Dec 16, 2025. Source: x.com
61/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#426 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #37 of 74 OpenAI posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It lands in Wide but thin, at #426 of 1,162 AI chart posts by score.

Its 0.19% engagement rate sits in the bottom decile, at the 4th percentile among AI chart posts.

At 609K views it runs 3.8x OpenAI's 162K median, ranking #15 of 74 OpenAI posts by views.

The bar chart's 609K views are 24x the 25.6K median for this type, against a 0.79% median engagement rate for this type.

24xthe median bar chart post

Across 241 bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 25.6K views.

0.11views per follower

608.9K views from an account with 5.4M followers.

bottom 4%engagement rate

0.19% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

3.8xOpenAI's median post

608.9K views, where OpenAI's typical post gets 161.5K.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 74 from OpenAI.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #426 of 1,162

Views608.9K#137top 12%
Likes954#281top 24%
Engagement rate0.19%#1,115bottom 4%
Save rate0.026%#1,014bottom 13%

Among 74 OpenAI posts

Score #37 of 74

Views608.9K#15top 20%
Likes954#33top 44%
Engagement rate0.19%#72bottom 3%
Save rate0.026%#61bottom 18%

Growth

Our reads cover 22 hours

Views608.9K
Age at our read301 days
Views per day of life2Kviews divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+3views over 22 hours, about 3 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

OpenAI's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Dec 16, 2025

OpenAI posts FrontierScience-Olympiad accuracy bar chart

The December 16, 2025 bar chart drew 609K views and a 0.19% engagement rate, landing in the Wide but thin quadrant.

What happened

OpenAI posted a bar chart on FrontierScience-Olympiad accuracy across models on December 16, 2025, with a second chart on FrontierScience-Research accuracy. It was the account's only post that day.

The numbers

It reached 609K views, #137 of 1,162 AI chart posts by views and #15 of 74 OpenAI posts. Its score of 61 ranks #426 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A bar chart at 609K views, 24x the 25.6K median for this type, still drew 0.19% engagement against a 0.79% median for this type. Wide reach on a familiar form did not carry the save-and-reply rate.

What it means

At #37 of 74 OpenAI posts by score and #1,115 of 1,162 AI chart posts by engagement, this post's 609K views sit far above its 0.19% engagement rate. The gap between its #15 of 74 OpenAI posts by views and its bottom-decile engagement is the pattern to watch.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Data and API

8 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 97%
SeriesGroupValueRead
GPT-4o12.3 %printed
OpenAI o142.5 %printed
OpenAI o4-mini61.7 %printed
OpenAI o362.9 %printed
Grok 466.2 %printed
Claude Opus 4.571.4 %printed
Gemini 3 Pro76.1 %printed
GPT-5.277.1 %printed

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/50f48d180aec.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/50f48d180aec.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/50f48d180aec.skill.md

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 50f48d180aec.

PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/50f48d180aecTitle, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/50f48d180aec/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/50f48d180aec/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/50f48d180aec/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GPT-4o

More from OpenAI

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

OpenAI published it on Dec 16, 2025 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.