- Giants
- Artificial Analysis
- AA-Briefcase Elo benchmark
AA-Briefcase Elo benchmark
Artificial Analysis's bar chart drew 4.2M views on X: 369x @artificialanlys's median post and #37 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 10, 2026.
Grok 4.7 is behind only Anthropic models on AA-Briefcase, ranking just behind Opus 5 at ~50% of its Cost per Task
Why it spread
This post spread because it landed on a hot topic that week and drew an unusually high quote rate, with 948 likes, 95 reposts, 52 quotes, 113 saves and 4,219,931 views against a typical 16 likes for the account.
What worked
- The post frames a clear ranking story, placing Grok 4.7 behind only Anthropic models and just behind Opus 5 at roughly half its cost per task.
- The chart is a simple bar ranking of AI agents on the AA-Briefcase Elo benchmark, which is easy to read and easy to argue about.
- The post ties the headline claim to a public due diligence scenario, AA-Briefcase-Lite, where models build market models and target assessment decks, giving the ranking a concrete use case.
What to borrow
We could reuse the same form by pairing one clean bar ranking of our own benchmark results with a single cost or efficiency comparison, then anchoring it to a public scenario our audience already understands.
Careful
Do not over-read the spread as proof the chart design drove it, since the main reasons given are many quotes and a hot topic that week, and the post shows no source line and only medium design polish and self labelling.
Written by our analysis model from the measured numbers above, not by Artificial Analysis.
Make it yours
Your numbers, in this bar chart.
Starts from the real numbers of "AA-Briefcase Elo" by artificial-analysis. Replace every number with yours before you post. Make one like this, step by step
Free pictures carry a small "Made with ViralChart" line. That line is how other people find us.
API · Max
Use this chart via API
On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id f9cbc4de869c.
Approximate values. Our two readings of this chart agreed only in part (confidence 0.48 of 1), so check the original before you quote a number. The API marks it lowConfidence, and ?min_confidence=0.5 leaves it out.
| Path | Returns | Plan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/v1/charts/f9cbc4de869c | Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link | Open |
| GET | /api/v1/charts/f9cbc4de869c/data | Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV | Max |
| GET | /api/v1/charts/f9cbc4de869c/render?view=1 | The draw-only view this page uses | Open |
| POST | /mcp | Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents | Max |
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/f9cbc4de869c/data \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
--header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.
More from Artificial Analysis
All 123
Other giants using a bar chart
All 152
Questions people ask
How far did Artificial Analysis's "AA-Briefcase Elo benchmark" chart travel?
4,219,931 views, 948 likes, 95 reposts and 113 saves on X, read Oct 10, 2026. A normal post from @ArtificialAnlys gets about 54.2K views.
What kind of chart is it?
A bar chart. Ranking of AI agents on AA-Briefcase Elo benchmark.
Can I use Artificial Analysis's chart?
Use the format, not the picture. The chart, logo and design belong to Artificial Analysis. ViralChart redraws the chart type with your numbers and words, and credits the original publisher.