- Giants
- Artificial Analysis
- AI Index Rankings
AI Index Rankings
Artificial Analysis's benchmark bar chart drew 949.7K views on X: 18x its typical post and #3 of 123 Artificial Analysis charts we track by views. Read Oct 10, 2026.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro debuts as the top open weights model on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46). At $0.13 per Intelligence Index task, it lands on the Intelligence vs. Cost per Task Pareto frontier
Why it spread
This post spread because it paired a clear benchmark bar chart with a strong news hook, an independent author, and a top performer claim, reaching 949,654 views, 4,156 likes, 394 reposts, 266 quotes, and 820 saves.
What worked
- The chart type is benchmark bars showing AI models ranked by index score with the top performer highlighted, which makes the ranking easy to grasp at a glance.
- The post text leads with a concrete debut claim and a Pareto frontier framing, giving viewers a reason to quote and share rather than just like.
- The account is an independent author in the ai-bench category, and the post shows a source line, which supports credibility for a benchmark comparison.
What to borrow
We could use the same benchmark bars form with our own data by ranking our models on a single index, highlighting our top performer, and pairing it with a short Pareto frontier or cost framing in the post text.
Careful
Do not over-read the quote rate or source reach as proofaland do not copy the exact claim or numbers, since the spread also depends on the independent author and the news timing.
Written by our analysis model from the measured numbers above, not by Artificial Analysis.
Make it yours
Your numbers, in this grouped bar chart.
Starts from the real numbers of "Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3, n=10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2," by Artificial Analysis. Replace every number with yours before you post. Make one like this, step by step
Free pictures carry a small "Made with ViralChart" line. That line is how other people find us.
API · Max
Use this chart via API
On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id fa7d556f4ac0.
Approximate values. Our two readings of this chart agreed only in part (confidence 0.30 of 1), so check the original before you quote a number. The API marks it lowConfidence, and ?min_confidence=0.5 leaves it out.
| Path | Returns | Plan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/v1/charts/fa7d556f4ac0 | Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link | Open |
| GET | /api/v1/charts/fa7d556f4ac0/data | Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV | Max |
| GET | /api/v1/charts/fa7d556f4ac0/render?view=1 | The draw-only view this page uses | Open |
| POST | /mcp | Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents | Max |
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/fa7d556f4ac0/data \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
--header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.
More from Artificial Analysis
All 123
Other giants using a benchmark bar chart
All 136
Questions people ask
How far did Artificial Analysis's "AI Index Rankings" chart travel?
949,654 views, 4,156 likes, 394 reposts and 820 saves on X, read Oct 10, 2026. A normal post from @ArtificialAnlys gets about 54.2K views.
What kind of chart is it?
A benchmark bar chart. AI models ranked by index score with highlighted top performer.
Can I use Artificial Analysis's chart?
Use the format, not the picture. The chart, logo and design belong to Artificial Analysis. ViralChart redraws the chart type with your numbers and words, and credits the original publisher.