1. Models
  2. OpenAI
  3. FrontierMath accuracy comparison
E
@EpochAIResearchX · Apr 18, 2025

FrontierMath accuracy comparison

@EpochAIResearch's benchmark bar chart drew 220.2K views on X: 42x @epochairesearch's median post and #247 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

FrontierMath accuracy for OpenAI models vs leading models

Published by @EpochAIResearch on X, Apr 18, 2025. Source: x.com
61/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#433 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #9 of 59 @epochairesearch posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, with a score rank of #433 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 220K views are 42x the 5.3K median for @EpochAIResearch posts, ranking #2 of 59 @EpochAIResearch posts.

Engagement sits at 0.32%, 0.43x the 0.73% median among AI chart posts, at 10th percentile.

The post ranked #1 of 4 @EpochAIResearch posts that day, with 4 posts from the account on April 18, 2025.

42x@epochairesearch's median post

220.2K views, where @epochairesearch's typical post gets 5.3K.

bottom 10%engagement rate

0.32% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

5.0xthe median benchmark bar chart post

Across 215 benchmark bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 44.4K views.

4posts from @epochairesearch that day

Part of a run of 4 posts on Apr 18, 2025. This one was #1 of 4 by views that day.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 59 from @epochairesearch.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #433 of 1,162

Views220.2K#247top 21%
Likes587#403top 35%
Engagement rate0.32%#1,041bottom 10%
Save rate0.084%#542top 47%

Among 59 @epochairesearch posts

Score #9 of 59

Views220.2K#2top 3%
Likes587#3top 4%
Engagement rate0.32%#59bottom 1%
Save rate0.084%#45bottom 25%

Growth

Our reads cover 27 hours

Views220.2K
Age at our read543 days
Views per day of life406views divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+0views over 27 hours, about 0 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

@epochairesearch's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Apr 18, 2025

@EpochAIResearch posts FrontierMath accuracy comparison chart

The FrontierMath accuracy comparison drew 220K views but an engagement rate of 0.32%, below the 0.73% median among AI chart posts.

What happened

@EpochAIResearch published a FrontierMath accuracy comparison bar chart on April 18, 2025, showing 7 models. It was one of 4 posts from the account that day, alongside MATH Level 5, GPQA Diamond, and OTIS Mock AIME comparisons.

The numbers

The post reached 220K views, ranking #247 of 1,162 AI chart posts by views and #2 of 59 @EpochAIResearch posts. Its score rank is #433 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A benchmark bar chart with 7 models drew 220K views, 42x the 5.3K median for @EpochAIResearch posts, but its 0.32% engagement rate is 0.43x the 0.73% median among AI chart posts. The chart type and model count did not translate into saves or replies at the median rate.

What it means

For @EpochAIResearch, this post ranks #2 of 59 @EpochAIResearch posts by views yet #1,041 of 1,162 AI chart posts by engagement, a gap between reach and interaction. The 0.32% engagement rate against the account's own 1.37% median shows the chart travelled widely but thin.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Data and API

14 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 37%
SeriesGroupValueRead
o4-mini17.5 %estimated
o4-mini20 %estimated
o3 mini10 %estimated
o3 mini13.5 %estimated
o17.5 %estimated
o110.5 %estimated
Grok-3 mini4.5 %estimated
Grok-3 mini6.5 %estimated
Claude 3.7 Sonnet3.5 %estimated
Claude 3.7 Sonnet5.5 %estimated
Grok-33 %estimated
Grok-35 %estimated

Showing 12 of 14. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/ff413a8ad264.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/ff413a8ad264.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/ff413a8ad264.skill.md

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id ff413a8ad264.

Approximate values. Our two readings of this chart agreed only in part (confidence 0.37 of 1), so check the original before you quote a number. The API marks it lowConfidence, and ?min_confidence=0.5 leaves it out.

PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/ff413a8ad264Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/ff413a8ad264/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/ff413a8ad264/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/ff413a8ad264/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GPT mini models

More from OpenAI

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

@EpochAIResearch published it on Apr 18, 2025 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.