1. Models
  2. Meta
  3. AI Model Benchmarks Comparison
A
@ArtificialAnlysX · Sep 2, 2026

AI Model Benchmarks Comparison

@ArtificialAnlys's leaderboard drew 26.4K views on X: 2.3x @artificialanlys's median post and #660 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

AI model performance across multiple benchmarks

XDataLeaderboardMuse SparkAll Meta modelsGPT-4oGPT-4Claude 3.5 SonnetGemini 1.5 ProGPT-4 TurboClaude 3 OpusGemini 1.5 FlashClaude 3 Sonnet
Published by @ArtificialAnlys on X, Sep 2, 2026. Source: x.com
34/ 100

ViralChart score

Quiet

Fewer views and a lower engagement rate than the median post.

#839 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #263 of 491 @artificialanlys posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It lands in the Quiet quadrant, with a score rank of #839 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 26.4K views rank #4 of 10 @ArtificialAnlys posts that day, level with the account's launch-day pattern.

Engagement sits at 0.40%, the 18th percentile among AI chart posts and below the 0.73% median.

At 2.3x the company median of 11.4K views, reach runs above the account's own baseline.

10posts from @artificialanlys that day

Part of a run of 10 posts on Sep 2, 2026. This one was #4 of 10 by views that day.

bottom 18%engagement rate

0.40% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

2.3x@artificialanlys's median post

26.4K views, where @artificialanlys's typical post gets 11.4K.

bottom 25%save rate

0.046% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 491 from @artificialanlys.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #839 of 1,162

Views26.4K#660bottom 43%
Likes100#763bottom 34%
Engagement rate0.40%#957bottom 18%
Save rate0.046%#867bottom 25%

Among 491 @artificialanlys posts

Score #263 of 491

Views26.4K#190top 39%
Likes100#230top 47%
Engagement rate0.40%#429bottom 13%
Save rate0.046%#352bottom 28%

Growth

One read so far

Views26.4K
Age at our read40 days
Views per day of life658views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

@artificialanlys's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Sep 2, 2026

@ArtificialAnlys posts a 15-model leaderboard on September 2, 2026

The leaderboard drew 26.4K views and a 0.40% engagement rate, landing in the Quiet quadrant.

What happened

@ArtificialAnlys published a leaderboard comparing AI model performance across multiple benchmarks on September 2, 2026. It was one of 10 posts from the account that day, alongside 9 others including Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.

The numbers

It reached 26.4K views, ranking #660 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #190 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts. Its score of 34 placed it at #839 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A 15-model leaderboard at 0.40% engagement sits at the 18th percentile among AI chart posts, below the 0.73% median. The 26.4K views rank #4 of 10 that day, so the reach held while engagement did not.

What it means

At #263 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts by score, this leaderboard trails the account's own body of work. The 2.3x lead over the company median of 11.4K views shows reach above the account's baseline, but the 0.40% engagement rate sits below the 0.82% account median.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Data and API

37 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 49%
SeriesGroupValueRead
Human Baseline (100)Human Baseline100 %estimated
Artificial AnalysisOpenAI o380.4 %estimated
Artificial AnalysisAnthropic Claude Opus 4.580.4 %estimated
Artificial AnalysisGoogle Gemini 3 Pro80.4 %estimated
Artificial AnalysisOpenAI GPT-5.1 (High)80.4 %estimated
Artificial AnalysisZhipu GLM-5 (High)80.4 %estimated
Artificial AnalysisAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.580.4 %estimated
Artificial AnalysisOpenAI GPT-5.1 (Medium)80.4 %estimated
Artificial AnalysisAnthropic Claude Haiku 4.580.4 %estimated
Artificial AnalysisGoogle Gemini 2.5 Pro80.4 %estimated
Artificial AnalysisAlibaba Qwen3-Max80.4 %estimated
Artificial AnalysisxAI Grok 4.180.4 %estimated

Showing 12 of 37. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/9eead7d0802e.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/9eead7d0802e.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/9eead7d0802e.skill.md

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 9eead7d0802e.

Approximate values. Our two readings of this chart agreed only in part (confidence 0.49 of 1), so check the original before you quote a number. The API marks it lowConfidence, and ?min_confidence=0.5 leaves it out.

PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/9eead7d0802eTitle, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/9eead7d0802e/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/9eead7d0802e/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/9eead7d0802e/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about Muse Spark

More from Meta

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

@ArtificialAnlys published it on Sep 2, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.