Models
DeepSeek
AI Model Token and Cost Analysis

@ArtificialAnlysX · Apr 24, 2026

AI Model Token and Cost Analysis

@ArtificialAnlys's bar chart drew 3.3K views on X: 0.3x @artificialanlys's median post and #1,022 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

Token usage and cost comparison across AI models

XData Bar chart DeepSeek V4 All DeepSeek models Claude 3.7 Sonnet GPT-5 MiniMax-M2 GPT-4.1 o3 o4-mini Grok 4.1

@ArtificialAnlys: AI Model Token and Cost Analysis — Published by @ArtificialAnlys on X, Apr 24, 2026. Source: x.com

24/ 100

ViralChart score

Small but loved

Fewer views than the median post but a higher engagement rate: a smaller crowd that acted on it.

#1,015 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #381 of 491 @artificialanlys posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

Small but loved quadrant: views below median, engagement at or above it, score rank #1,015.

Its score of 24 ranks #1,015 of 1,162 AI chart posts, below the median.

Its 3.3K views are 0.29x the company median of 11.4K, ranking #393 of 491 posts.

On launch day, it ranked #6 of 7 posts from the account, with 7 posts that day.

0.1xthe median bar chart post

Across 241 bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 25.6K views.

7posts from @artificialanlys that day

Part of a run of 7 posts on Apr 24, 2026. This one was #6 of 7 by views that day.

0.3x@artificialanlys's median post

3.3K views, where @artificialanlys's typical post gets 11.4K.

bottom 39%save rate

0.061% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 491 from @artificialanlys.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #1,015 of 1,162

Views	3.3K	#1,022	bottom 12%
Likes	25	#984	bottom 15%
Engagement rate	0.82%	#474	top 41%
Save rate	0.061%	#713	bottom 39%

Among 491 @artificialanlys posts

Score #381 of 491

Views	3.3K	#393	bottom 20%
Likes	25	#362	bottom 27%
Engagement rate	0.82%	#244	top 50%
Save rate	0.061%	#291	bottom 41%

Growth

One read so far

Views3.3K

Age at our read171 days

Views per day of life19views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

@artificialanlys's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Apr 24, 2026

@ArtificialAnlys token cost chart ranks low in views

A 30-model bar chart on token and cost analysis drew 3.3K views, below the AI chart median.

What happened

On April 24, 2026, @ArtificialAnlys posted a bar chart comparing token usage and cost across 30 AI models. It was one of 7 posts that day, alongside 6 others including a 249K-view index.

The numbers

Views were 3.3K, ranking #1,022 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #393 of 491 account posts. Its score of 24 ranked #1,015 of 1,162.

The lesson

With 30 models in one chart, the post's save rate was 0.061%, but its views were 0.29x the company median. A crowded chart may not boost reach.

What it means

For @ArtificialAnlys, this post underperformed its own median by 0.29x, while same-day posts with fewer models drew far more views. Chart density may not drive traffic.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what @artificialanlys posted next

Data and API

23 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 30%

Group	Value	Read
OpenAI o1 (high)	230 M	estimated
OpenAI o1 (medium)	200 M	estimated
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (high)	190 M	estimated
DeepSeek V2 (high)	180 M	estimated
Kimi K2 (high)	170 M	estimated
GPT-5 (high)	120 M	estimated
Grok 3 (high)	120 M	estimated
Solar Pro (high)	110 M	estimated
GLM-4.5 (high)	110 M	estimated
4.7 (high)	110 M	estimated
NVIDIA Nemotron (high)	99 M	estimated
K2 Think V2 (high)	92 M	estimated

Showing 12 of 23. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/7c0a7b28d979.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/7c0a7b28d979.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/7c0a7b28d979.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 7c0a7b28d979.

Approximate values. Our two readings of this chart agreed only in part (confidence 0.30 of 1), so check the original before you quote a number. The API marks it lowConfidence, and ?min_confidence=0.5 leaves it out.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/7c0a7b28d979`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/7c0a7b28d979/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/7c0a7b28d979/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/7c0a7b28d979/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.