1. Models
  2. Meta
  3. AI Model Benchmark Comparison
MetaX · Oct 12, 2026 · official

AI Model Benchmark Comparison

Meta's table chart drew 10.4K views on X: 0.3x its median post and #811 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

AI model performance across various benchmarks

XDataTable chartMuse WonderAll Meta modelsMuse Wonder Full (max)Muse Wonder (max)Claude 5.1 (max)GPT-6 Astra (max)Claude Opus 5.5 (max)
Published by Meta on X, Oct 12, 2026. Source: x.com
44/ 100

ViralChart score

Small but loved

Fewer views than the median post but a higher engagement rate: a smaller crowd that acted on it.

#704 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #18 of 31 Meta posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in Small but loved, with a score rank of #704 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 0.012 views per follower sits at 0.06x the 0.20 median across posts with known followers, a 6th percentile mark.

Engagement lands at 1.44%, 2x the 0.73% median among AI chart posts and the 91st percentile.

Views of 10.4K are 0.28x Meta's 36.4K company median, ranking #22 of 31 Meta posts.

0.01views per follower

10.4K views from an account with 865.4K followers.

0.1xthe median table chart post

Across 95 table chart posts we hold, the median gets 133.2K views.

0.3xMeta's median post

10.4K views, where Meta's typical post gets 36.4K.

top 9%engagement rate

1.44% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 31 from Meta.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #704 of 1,162

Views10.4K#811bottom 30%
Likes120#744bottom 36%
Engagement rate1.44%#104top 9%
Save rate0.077%#577top 50%

Among 31 Meta posts

Score #18 of 31

Views10.4K#22bottom 31%
Likes120#22bottom 31%
Engagement rate1.44%#3top 8%
Save rate0.077%#17bottom 47%

Growth

Our reads cover 21 hours

Views10.4K
Age at our read1 days
Views per day of life10.3Kviews divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+5Kviews over 21 hours, about 5.7K a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Meta's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Oct 12, 2026

Meta posts a table chart of AI model benchmark scores

The table chart drew 10.4K views and a 1.44% engagement rate, landing in the Small but loved quadrant.

What happened

Meta published a table chart on October 12, 2026, comparing AI model performance across benchmarks. It was one of 4 posts from the account that day, alongside FocusBench AI Model Scores, Cyber Misuse Refusal Benchmark and Model Performance Comparison.

The numbers

It reached 10.4K views, ranking #811 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #22 of 31 Meta posts. Its score of 44 ranks #704 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #18 of 31 Meta posts.

The lesson

A table chart with 5 models shown drew a 1.44% engagement rate, 2x the 0.73% median among AI chart posts. The 0.077% save rate sits far below that engagement, so the post drew reactions rather than saves.

What it means

At #18 of 31 Meta posts by score, this chart sits mid-pack for the account. Its 10.4K views against the 39.9K median among AI chart posts show the reach gap that keeps it out of the top ranks.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Data and API

65 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 92%
SeriesGroupValueRead
Muse Wonder Full (max)Harvey Lab-AA59.1 scoreprinted
Muse Wonder (max)Harvey Lab-AA13.1 scoreprinted
Claude 5.1 (max)Harvey Lab-AA10 scoreprinted
GPT-6 Astra (max)Harvey Lab-AA6.4 scoreprinted
Claude Opus 5.5 (max)Harvey Lab-AA5.4 scoreprinted
Muse Wonder Full (max)Vals Finance Agent V259.1 scoreprinted
Muse Wonder (max)Vals Finance Agent V256.6 scoreprinted
Claude 5.1 (max)Vals Finance Agent V258.9 scoreprinted
GPT-6 Astra (max)Vals Finance Agent V253.5 scoreprinted
Claude Opus 5.5 (max)Vals Finance Agent V258.6 scoreprinted
Muse Wonder Full (max)HealthBench Pro62.3 scoreprinted
Muse Wonder (max)HealthBench Pro60.5 scoreprinted

Showing 12 of 65. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/52d945ac7148.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/52d945ac7148.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/52d945ac7148.skill.md

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 52d945ac7148.

PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/52d945ac7148Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/52d945ac7148/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/52d945ac7148/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/52d945ac7148/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about Muse Wonder

More from Meta

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Meta published it on Oct 12, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.