Models
Meta
FocusBench AI Model Scores

MetaX · Oct 12, 2026 · official

FocusBench AI Model Scores

Meta's bar chart drew 10.2K views on X: 0.3x its median post and #813 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

AI model scores on FocusBench benchmark

XData Bar chart Muse Wonder All Meta modelsMuse Wonder Full (max)GPT-6 Astra (max)Claude Opus 5.5 (max)Muse Wonder (max)Claude Fable 5.1 (max)

Meta: FocusBench AI Model Scores — Published by Meta on X, Oct 12, 2026. Source: x.com

41/ 100

ViralChart score

Small but loved

Fewer views than the median post but a higher engagement rate: a smaller crowd that acted on it.

#740 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #22 of 31 Meta posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in the Small but loved quadrant, at #740 of 1,162 AI chart posts by score.

Its 0.012 views per follower sits at the 6th percentile among posts with known followers, a bottom decile figure against a 0.20 median.

The post's 10.2K views are 0.28x Meta's 36.4K median, ranking #23 of 31 Meta posts by views.

Engagement lands at 1.06%, the 75th percentile among AI chart posts and above the 0.73% median.

0.01views per follower

10.2K views from an account with 865.4K followers.

2charts in this one post

The numbers belong to the post, so every chart in it shares them and it is ranked once.

0.3xMeta's median post

10.2K views, where Meta's typical post gets 36.4K.

4posts from Meta that day

Part of a run of 4 posts on Oct 12, 2026. This one was #2 of 4 by views that day.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 31 from Meta.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #740 of 1,162

Views	10.2K	#813	bottom 30%
Likes	83	#785	bottom 32%
Engagement rate	1.06%	#286	top 25%
Save rate	0.088%	#513	top 44%

Among 31 Meta posts

Score #22 of 31

Views	10.2K	#23	bottom 27%
Likes	83	#23	bottom 27%
Engagement rate	1.06%	#9	top 27%
Save rate	0.088%	#15	top 47%

Growth

Our reads cover 21 hours

Views10.2K

Age at our read1 days

Views per day of life10.2Kviews divided by days since it was posted

Gained between our reads+5.8Kviews over 21 hours, about 6.7K a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Meta's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Oct 12, 2026

Meta posts FocusBench AI model scores bar chart

The FocusBench bar chart drew 10.2K views and a 1.06% engagement rate, with a 0.088% save rate.

What happened

Meta published a bar chart of FocusBench AI model scores on October 12, 2026, alongside a MemoryBench AI Model Scores chart. That day the account posted 4 times, including an AI Model Benchmark Comparison at 10.4K views.

The numbers

It reached 10.2K views, #813 of 1,162 AI chart posts by views and #23 of 31 Meta posts. Its score of 41 ranks #740 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #22 of 31 Meta posts.

The lesson

A 1.06% engagement rate at the 75th percentile among AI chart posts came with a 0.088% save rate. The 5-model bar chart drew 10.2K views against a 39.9K median among AI chart posts.

What it means

At #22 of 31 Meta posts by score and 0.28x the company's 36.4K median views, this chart sits below Meta's own reach. Its 1.06% engagement rate is above the 0.81% median for this account.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Meta posted next

Data and API

5 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 97%

Group	Value	Read
Muse Wonder Full (max)	54.2 %	printed
GPT-6 Astra (max)	47.7 %	printed
Claude Opus 5.5 (max)	45.8 %	printed
Muse Wonder (max)	44.9 %	printed
Claude Fable 5.1 (max)	36.6 %	printed

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/2b054945a823.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/2b054945a823.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/2b054945a823.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 2b054945a823.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/2b054945a823`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/2b054945a823/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/2b054945a823/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/2b054945a823/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.