1. Models
  2. OpenAI
  3. Intelligence vs. Price: Non-Reasoning Models
A
@ArtificialAnlysX · Apr 15, 2025

Intelligence vs. Price: Non-Reasoning Models

@ArtificialAnlys's scatter plot drew 93.9K views on X: 8.2x @artificialanlys's median post and #392 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

Most attractive quadrant highlighted for non-reasoning models

Published by @ArtificialAnlys on X, Apr 15, 2025. Source: x.com
59/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#468 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #147 of 491 @artificialanlys posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, with a score rank of #468 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 93.9K views are 8.2x @ArtificialAnlys's median post, ranking #91 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts by views.

The post carries 2 charts, and every chart in the post shares the post's numbers.

It ranked #1 of 2 posts from this account that day, against 9K views for the other post.

8.2x@artificialanlys's median post

93.9K views, where @artificialanlys's typical post gets 11.4K.

2charts in this one post

The numbers belong to the post, so every chart in it shares them and it is ranked once.

3.7xthe median scatter plot post

Across 241 scatter plot posts we hold, the median gets 25.6K views.

2posts from @artificialanlys that day

Part of a run of 2 posts on Apr 15, 2025. This one was #1 of 2 by views that day.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 491 from @artificialanlys.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #468 of 1,162

Views93.9K#392top 34%
Likes428#487top 42%
Engagement rate0.55%#763bottom 34%
Save rate0.102%#419top 36%

Among 491 @artificialanlys posts

Score #147 of 491

Views93.9K#91top 18%
Likes428#141top 29%
Engagement rate0.55%#357bottom 27%
Save rate0.102%#188top 38%

Growth

One read so far

Views93.9K
Age at our read545 days
Views per day of life172views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

@artificialanlys's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Apr 15, 2025

@ArtificialAnlys posts Intelligence vs. Price scatter for non-reasoning models

The April 15, 2025 post drew 93.9K views and 428 likes, with a 0.55% engagement rate and a 0.10% save rate.

What happened

On April 15, 2025, @ArtificialAnlys published a scatter plot on Intelligence vs. Price for non-reasoning models, with 15 models shown and 2 charts in the post. That day the account posted 2 times, including a post on GPQA Diamond (Scientific Reasoning): Open Weights Models.

The numbers

The post reached 93.9K views, ranking #392 of 1,162 AI chart posts by views and #91 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts. Its score rank is #468 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A 2-chart post with 15 models shown drew 93.9K views, 8.2x @ArtificialAnlys's median of 11.4K, but its 0.10% save rate sits below the 0.55% engagement rate.

What it means

For @ArtificialAnlys, this post's 93.9K views rank #91 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts, while its score rank is #468 of 1,162 AI chart posts, showing a gap between views and score.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Data and API

14 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 39%
SeriesGroupValueRead
DeepSeek V3 (Mar' 25)54 indexestimated
GPT-4.1 mini53 indexestimated
Llama 4 Maverick51 indexestimated
Gemini 2.0 Flash48 indexestimated
Llama 4 Scout41 indexestimated
GPT-4.1 nano38 indexestimated
Mistral Small 3.135 indexestimated
Nova Pro37 indexestimated
Claude 3.5 Haiku34 indexprinted
GPT-4.152 indexestimated
GPT-4o (Nov '24)41 indexestimated
Mistral Large 2 (Nov '24)38 indexestimated

Showing 12 of 14. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/2505586f1a92.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/2505586f1a92.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/2505586f1a92.skill.md

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 2505586f1a92.

Approximate values. Our two readings of this chart agreed only in part (confidence 0.39 of 1), so check the original before you quote a number. The API marks it lowConfidence, and ?min_confidence=0.5 leaves it out.

PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/2505586f1a92Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/2505586f1a92/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/2505586f1a92/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/2505586f1a92/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about GPT-4

More from OpenAI

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

@ArtificialAnlys published it on Apr 15, 2025 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.