Models
DeepSeek
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index vs Cost

@ArtificialAnlysX · Sep 10, 2026

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index vs Cost

@ArtificialAnlys's annotated chart drew 293.5K views on X: 26x @artificialanlys's median post and #213 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

AI models intelligence vs cost comparison

XData Annotated chart DeepSeek V4 All DeepSeek modelsGPT-5.2 (high)Claude Opus 4.5Gemini 3.5 FlashGPT-5.1 (high)Claude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5.1 (low)

@ArtificialAnlys: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index vs Cost — Published by @ArtificialAnlys on X, Sep 10, 2026. Source: x.com

66/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#323 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #91 of 491 @artificialanlys posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, with a score rank of #323 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 293K views are 26x @ArtificialAnlys's median post, ranking #39 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts by views.

Engagement sits at 0.48%, the 26th percentile among AI chart posts, below the 0.73% median among AI chart posts.

It was #1 of 2 @ArtificialAnlys posts that day, ahead of the day's other post at 9.8K views.

26x@artificialanlys's median post

293.5K views, where @artificialanlys's typical post gets 11.4K.

13xthe median annotated chart post

Across 62 annotated chart posts we hold, the median gets 22.8K views.

2posts from @artificialanlys that day

Part of a run of 2 posts on Sep 10, 2026. This one was #1 of 2 by views that day.

bottom 26%engagement rate

0.48% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 491 from @artificialanlys.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #323 of 1,162

Views	293.5K	#213	top 18%
Likes	1.2K	#240	top 21%
Engagement rate	0.48%	#864	bottom 26%
Save rate	0.055%	#758	bottom 35%

Among 491 @artificialanlys posts

Score #91 of 491

Views	293.5K	#39	top 8%
Likes	1.2K	#43	top 9%
Engagement rate	0.48%	#391	bottom 20%
Save rate	0.055%	#310	bottom 37%

Growth

Our reads cover 28 hours

Views293.5K

Age at our read33 days

Views per day of life8.9Kviews divided by days since it was posted

Gained between our reads+36views over 28 hours, about 31 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

@artificialanlys's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Sep 10, 2026

@ArtificialAnlys posts intelligence vs cost chart for 6 models

An annotated chart comparing AI model intelligence against cost drew 293K views but an engagement rate of 0.48%.

What happened

@ArtificialAnlys published an annotated chart on September 10, 2026, comparing AI model intelligence against cost. The account posted 2 items that day, including an AI Model Benchmarks Comparison at 9.8K views.

The numbers

The post reached 293K views, ranking #213 of 1,162 AI chart posts by views and #39 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts. Its score rank is #323 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

At 0.48% engagement against a 0.73% median among AI chart posts, this annotated chart drew views but ranked #864 of 1,162 AI chart posts on engagement. A 6-model comparison can travel on views while sitting at the 26th percentile on engagement.

What it means

For @ArtificialAnlys, 293K views is 26x its own median of 11.4K, yet the 0.48% engagement rate trails its own median of 0.82%. The gap between #39 of 491 on views and #91 of 491 on score is where this chart post sits.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what @artificialanlys posted next

Data and API

24 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 30%

Group	Value	Read
Claude Opus 4.5 (high)	53	estimated
GPT-5.1 (high)	53	estimated
Gemini 3.1 Pro (high)	51	estimated
Claude Opus 4.5 (low)	50	estimated
Gemini 3.1 Flash (high)	48	estimated
GPT-5.1 (low)	47	estimated
Gemini 3.1 Flash (low)	45	estimated
GPT-5.1 (medium)	44	estimated
Kimi K2.5 (high)	44	estimated
Gemini 3.1 Pro (low)	42	estimated
Claude Opus 4.5 (medium)	41	estimated
Gemini 3.1 Pro (medium)	40	estimated

Showing 12 of 24. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/05ef0f2d8a78.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/05ef0f2d8a78.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/05ef0f2d8a78.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 05ef0f2d8a78.

Approximate values. Our two readings of this chart agreed only in part (confidence 0.30 of 1), so check the original before you quote a number. The API marks it lowConfidence, and ?min_confidence=0.5 leaves it out.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/05ef0f2d8a78`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/05ef0f2d8a78/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/05ef0f2d8a78/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/05ef0f2d8a78/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.