Models
DeepSeek
AI Model Benchmarks Comparison

@ArtificialAnlysX · Sep 10, 2026

AI Model Benchmarks Comparison

@ArtificialAnlys's small multiples drew 9.8K views on X: 0.9x @artificialanlys's median post and #821 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

Multiple AI model benchmark comparisons across various tasks

XData Small multiples DeepSeek V4 All DeepSeek models GPT-5 Gemini 3 Pro Grok 4 Kimi K2 Qwen3-Max MiniMax-M2 GLM-5 Llama 4 Maverick

@ArtificialAnlys: AI Model Benchmarks Comparison — Published by @ArtificialAnlys on X, Sep 10, 2026. Source: x.com

29/ 100

ViralChart score

Quiet

Fewer views and a lower engagement rate than the median post.

#924 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #315 of 491 @artificialanlys posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Quiet quadrant and ranks #924 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 0.41% engagement rate sits at the 19th percentile among AI chart posts, 0.56x the 0.73% median.

The score of 29 places it at #924 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

It ranked #2 of 2 posts from this account that day, with 2 posts total.

bottom 19%engagement rate

0.41% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

2posts from @artificialanlys that day

Part of a run of 2 posts on Sep 10, 2026. This one was #2 of 2 by views that day.

0.4xthe median small multiples post

Across 43 small multiples posts we hold, the median gets 27K views.

top 41%save rate

0.092% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 491 from @artificialanlys.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #924 of 1,162

Views	9.8K	#821	bottom 29%
Likes	37	#925	bottom 20%
Engagement rate	0.41%	#944	bottom 19%
Save rate	0.092%	#481	top 41%

Among 491 @artificialanlys posts

Score #315 of 491

Views	9.8K	#261	bottom 47%
Likes	37	#326	bottom 33%
Engagement rate	0.41%	#422	bottom 14%
Save rate	0.092%	#211	top 43%

Growth

One read so far

Views9.8K

Age at our read32 days

Views per day of life305views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

@artificialanlys's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Sep 10, 2026

@ArtificialAnlys posts AI model benchmarks comparison chart

A small multiples chart showing 15 models drew 9.8K views and a 0.41% engagement rate, below the AI chart median.

What happened

@ArtificialAnlys published a small multiples chart comparing AI model benchmarks on September 10, 2026. It was one of 2 posts from the account that day, alongside a post on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index vs Cost.

The numbers

The post reached 9.8K views, ranking #821 of 1,162 AI chart posts. Its score of 29 ranked #924 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #315 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts.

The lesson

With 15 models shown in 1 chart, the post earned a 0.092% save rate and 0.41% engagement rate. A 15-model comparison in a single small multiples chart drew 0.56x the AI median engagement rate.

What it means

At #315 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts, this chart underperformed the account's own median engagement rate of 0.82%. The 9.8K views against a 39.9K median among AI chart posts show a wide gap for this publisher.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what @artificialanlys posted next

Data and API

100 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 50%

Group	Value	Read
A	100 %	estimated
A	100 %	estimated
A	100 %	estimated
A	100 %	estimated
A	100 %	estimated
A	100 %	estimated
A	100 %	estimated
A	100 %	estimated
A	100 %	estimated
A	100 %	estimated
A	100 %	estimated
A	100 %	estimated

Showing 12 of 100. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/596c3794d754.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/596c3794d754.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/596c3794d754.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 596c3794d754.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/596c3794d754`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/596c3794d754/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/596c3794d754/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/596c3794d754/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.