- Giants
- SemiAnalysis
- Using May 2025 software, GB200 NVL72 had 9%
Using May 2025 software, GB200 NVL72 had 9%
SemiAnalysis's annotated chart drew 118.4K views on X: 2.3x its typical post and #10 of 33 SemiAnalysis charts we track by views. Read Oct 10, 2026.
Using May 2025 software, GB200 NVL72 had 9% worse DeepSeek 670B MoE training perf per TCO than H100. Using July 2025 software, GB200 NVL72 massively improved and now has an 1.52x better perf per TCO than h100. Performance projections sugges
Why it spread
It spread because an independent author with a big source reach posted a striking performance turnaround, from 9% worse to 1.52x better and a projected 2.8x, which drew 460 likes, 56 reposts, 14 quotes, 162 saves and 118,361 views.
What worked
- The post frames a clear before and after using May 2025 software at 9% worse and July 2025 software at 1.52x better, which makes the improvement easy to grasp.
- It comes from an independent author with a big source reach, so the audience already trusts the account to publish credible AI infrastructure numbers.
- It adds a forward looking projection for December 2025 software at 2.8, which gives readers a reason to save and share the post beyond the current result.
What to borrow
We could take one of our own charts and frame it as a dated before and after, showing an earlier weaker result and a later stronger result, then add a clearly labeled projection for a future period.
Careful
Do not copy the projection as if it were a measured result, and do not over-read the engagement as proof that the chart design or the underlying data was independently verified.
Written by our analysis model from the measured numbers above, not by SemiAnalysis.
Make it yours
Your numbers, in this table chart.
Starts from the real numbers of "DeepSeek 670B BF16 Training Performance - GB200 NVL72 vs H100" by SemiAnalysis. Replace every number with yours before you post. Make one like this, step by step
Free pictures carry a small "Made with ViralChart" line. That line is how other people find us.
API · Max
Use this chart via API
On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 65d06ddd5bcd.
Approximate values. Our two readings of this chart agreed only in part (confidence 0.41 of 1), so check the original before you quote a number. The API marks it lowConfidence, and ?min_confidence=0.5 leaves it out.
| Path | Returns | Plan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/v1/charts/65d06ddd5bcd | Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link | Open |
| GET | /api/v1/charts/65d06ddd5bcd/data | Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV | Max |
| GET | /api/v1/charts/65d06ddd5bcd/render?view=1 | The draw-only view this page uses | Open |
| POST | /mcp | Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents | Max |
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/65d06ddd5bcd/data \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
--header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.
More from SemiAnalysis
All 33
Other giants using a annotated chart
All 102
Questions people ask
How far did SemiAnalysis's "Using May 2025 software, GB200 NVL72 had 9%" chart travel?
118,361 views, 460 likes, 56 reposts and 162 saves on X, read Oct 10, 2026. A normal post from @SemiAnalysis_ gets about 52.2K views.
What kind of chart is it?
A annotated chart.
Can I use SemiAnalysis's chart?
Use the format, not the picture. The chart, logo and design belong to SemiAnalysis. ViralChart redraws the chart type with your numbers and words, and credits the original publisher.