- Giants
- Artificial Analysis
- Physics reasoning benchmarks
Physics reasoning benchmarks
Artificial Analysis's benchmark bar chart drew 113.8K views on X: 10.0x @artificialanlys's median post and #355 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 10, 2026.
AI is progressing rapidly: GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) has achieved a massive 10 point gain in CritPt, a benchmark where the highest score was only 9% in Nov ‘25
Why it spread
The post spread because it announced a massive 10 point gain in CritPt from GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh), where the highest score was only 9% in Nov '25, and it was posted by an independent author at launch timing, drawing 1,014 likes, 117 reposts, 22 quotes, 163 saves, and 113,786 views against the account's typical 16 likes.
What worked
- The post text leads with a concrete, large gain of 10 points on a benchmark where the previous top score was only 9%, making the progress feel dramatic and easy to grasp.
- The chart type is benchmark bars showing model performance ranking on physics reasoning tasks, which fits a simple comparison format that audiences can read quickly.
- The post is branded and includes a source line, and it came from an independent author at launch timing, which added credibility and urgency without relying on the account's usual reach.
What to borrow
We could use the same benchmark bars form and framing by pairing our own chart with a short post that highlights one clear before and after number on a task where the prior best was low, while keeping a visible source line and independent tone.
Careful
Do not copy the exact numbers or assume the same lift will happen for us, since the spread depended on launch timing talents and an independent author, and the quote rate was below average, so the post drove views and saves more than discussion.
Written by our analysis model from the measured numbers above, not by Artificial Analysis.
Make it yours
Your numbers, in this bar chart.
Starts from the real numbers of "CritPt Benchmark Leaderboard: Research-level Physics Reasoning Tasks" by Artificial Analysis. Replace every number with yours before you post. Make one like this, step by step
Free pictures carry a small "Made with ViralChart" line. That line is how other people find us.
API · Max
Use this chart via API
On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id d1c68cd98444.
| Path | Returns | Plan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/v1/charts/d1c68cd98444 | Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link | Open |
| GET | /api/v1/charts/d1c68cd98444/data | Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV | Max |
| GET | /api/v1/charts/d1c68cd98444/render?view=1 | The draw-only view this page uses | Open |
| POST | /mcp | Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents | Max |
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/d1c68cd98444/data \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
--header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.
More from Artificial Analysis
All 123
Other giants using a benchmark bar chart
All 136
Questions people ask
How far did Artificial Analysis's "Physics reasoning benchmarks" chart travel?
113,786 views, 1,014 likes, 117 reposts and 163 saves on X, read Oct 10, 2026. A normal post from @ArtificialAnlys gets about 54.2K views.
What kind of chart is it?
A benchmark bar chart. Model performance ranking on physics reasoning tasks.
Can I use Artificial Analysis's chart?
Use the format, not the picture. The chart, logo and design belong to Artificial Analysis. ViralChart redraws the chart type with your numbers and words, and credits the original publisher.