- Giants
- Artificial Analysis
- AI model performance comparison
AI model performance comparison
Artificial Analysis's benchmark bar chart drew 3.9K views on X: 0.1x its typical post and #118 of 123 Artificial Analysis charts we track by views. Read Oct 14, 2026.
HeyGen Voice processes 40 characters per second of generation time at $30/1M characters.
Why it spread
This chart post spread mainly because it landed at launch timing from an independent author, and its benchmark bars compared characters per second and price across AI models, drawing 3,817 views, 11 likes, 3 saves, 0 reposts, and 0 quotes against the account's typical 16 likes.
What worked
- The post paired a clear speed figure of 40 characters per second with a simple price ladder from $19.3 to $30 to $40 to $80 per 1M characters, making the comparison easy to grasp at a glance.
- The independent author framing gave the benchmark extra credibility at launch timing, when interest in new voice models was high.
- The branded benchmark bars with medium design polish and medium self labelling kept the focus on the numbers rather than on decoration.
What to borrow
We could reuse this benchmark bars form by pairing one speed metric with a short price ladder for our own models, and by publishing at launch timing as an independent author voice rather than as a vendor announcement.
Careful
Do not over-read the low engagement: 0 reposts and 0 quotes with only 3 saves and 11 likes against a typical 16 likes means the reach came from views, not from sharing, and the missing source line plus null points and comments leave the evidence thin.
Written by our analysis model from the measured numbers above, not by Artificial Analysis.
Make it yours
We have not read this chart's numbers yet
Its own maker appears here once its numbers are read. Until then, these are other real charts in a similar format: each data page starts from that chart's numbers and takes yours.
API · Max
Use this chart via API
On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id d5f7c9419500.
Approximate values. Our two readings of this chart agreed only in part (confidence 0.47 of 1), so check the original before you quote a number. The API marks it lowConfidence, and ?min_confidence=0.5 leaves it out.
| Path | Returns | Plan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GET | /api/v1/charts/d5f7c9419500 | Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link | Open |
| GET | /api/v1/charts/d5f7c9419500/data | Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV | Max |
| GET | /api/v1/charts/d5f7c9419500/render?view=1 | The draw-only view this page uses | Open |
| POST | /mcp | Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents | Max |
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/d5f7c9419500/data \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
--header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.
More from Artificial Analysis
All 123
Other giants using a benchmark bar chart
All 136
Questions people ask
How far did Artificial Analysis's "AI model performance comparison" chart travel?
3,925 views, 11 likes, 0 reposts and 3 saves on X, read Oct 14, 2026. A normal post from @ArtificialAnlys gets about 54.2K views.
What kind of chart is it?
A benchmark bar chart. Characters per second and price across AI models.
Can I use Artificial Analysis's chart?
Use the format, not the picture. The chart, logo and design belong to Artificial Analysis. ViralChart redraws the chart type with your numbers and words, and credits the original publisher.