1. Giants
  2. Artificial Analysis
  3. AI model benchmark comparison
Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlys · Sep 30, 2026 · Small multiples

AI model benchmark comparison

Artificial Analysis's small multiples drew 622.3K views on X: 54x @artificialanlys's median post and #133 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 10, 2026.

Google’s new Gemini 4 Argon equals GPT-6 Astra on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at 60% of the Cost per Task with discounted prices. Google is now back to being one of the top three labs in intelligence achieved

Posted on X by @ArtificialAnlys (Artificial Analysis), Sep 30, 2026. Source: x.com · See its data

Why it spread

It spread because an independent author paired a small multiples chart of AI models on intelligence index and cost efficiency with a post claiming Gemini 4 Argon equals GPT-6 Astra at 60% of the cost per task, drawing 619,121 views, 4,901 likes, 453 reposts, 228 quotes, and 635 saves.

What worked

  • The chart type is small multiples, which lets readers compare several models on intelligence index and cost efficiency at once without a single crowded plot.
  • The post is branded and shows a source line, while the design polish and self labelling are medium, so the chart reads as credible but still plain enough to scan quickly.
  • The framing is a direct competitive claim about cost and intelligence, and the quote rate sits in the top quarter, so the post invited many quotes and discussion.

What to borrow

We could use the same small multiples form and the same framing of comparing our own models on two axes, with a clear source line and a plain claim about cost and capability, while keeping our own measured numbers.

Careful

Do not copy the exact competitive claim or treat the view and like counts as proofagd of the chart design alone, since the independent author and the many quotes also drove the spread, and the source reach is only in the bottom quarter.

Written by our analysis model from the measured numbers above, not by Artificial Analysis.

Make it yours

We have not read this chart's numbers yet

All chart data

Its own maker appears here once its numbers are read. Until then, these are other real charts in a similar format: each data page starts from that chart's numbers and takes yours.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 62851206fe99.

PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/62851206fe99Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/62851206fe99/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/62851206fe99/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/62851206fe99/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More from Artificial Analysis

All 123

Other giants using a small multiples

All 49

Questions people ask

How far did Artificial Analysis's "AI model benchmark comparison" chart travel?

619,121 views, 4,901 likes, 453 reposts and 635 saves on X, read Oct 10, 2026. A normal post from @ArtificialAnlys gets about 54.2K views.

What kind of chart is it?

A small multiples. AI models compared on intelligence index and cost efficiency.

Can I use Artificial Analysis's chart?

Use the format, not the picture. The chart, logo and design belong to Artificial Analysis. ViralChart redraws the chart type with your numbers and words, and credits the original publisher.