1. Models
  2. Google
  3. AA-Omniscence Index, Accuracy, and Hallucination Rate
A
@ArtificialAnlysX · Nov 18, 2025

AA-Omniscence Index, Accuracy, and Hallucination Rate

@ArtificialAnlys's benchmark bar chart drew 290.8K views on X: 25x @artificialanlys's median post and #215 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

AA-Omniscence benchmarks: Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads in index, accuracy, and low hallucination.

XDataBenchmark bar chartGemini 3All Google modelsGPT-4oClaude 3.5 SonnetGemini 1.5 ProClaude 3 OpusGPT-4 TurboClaude 3.5 Sonnet (New)Gemini 1.5 FlashGPT-3.5 Turbo
Published by @ArtificialAnlys on X, Nov 18, 2025. Source: x.com
63/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#386 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #119 of 491 @artificialanlys posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

Wide but thin: views above median, engagement below; score rank #386 of 1,162.

This post drew 291K views, 25x the account's 11.4K median, ranking #40 of 491 posts.

Engagement ran 0.34%, 0.46x the AI median of 0.73%, landing at the 12th percentile.

On launch day it ranked #1 of 4 posts from the account, ahead of 252K and 9.8K.

25x@artificialanlys's median post

290.8K views, where @artificialanlys's typical post gets 11.4K.

6.5xthe median benchmark bar chart post

Across 215 benchmark bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 44.4K views.

bottom 12%engagement rate

0.34% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

4posts from @artificialanlys that day

Part of a run of 4 posts on Nov 18, 2025. This one was #1 of 4 by views that day.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 491 from @artificialanlys.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #386 of 1,162

Views290.8K#215top 18%
Likes798#309top 27%
Engagement rate0.34%#1,024bottom 12%
Save rate0.065%#666bottom 43%

Among 491 @artificialanlys posts

Score #119 of 491

Views290.8K#40top 8%
Likes798#71top 14%
Engagement rate0.34%#451bottom 8%
Save rate0.065%#277bottom 44%

Growth

Our reads cover 27 hours

Views290.8K
Age at our read329 days
Views per day of life884views divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+1views over 27 hours, about 1 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

@artificialanlys's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Nov 18, 2025

@ArtificialAnlys benchmark chart hits 291K views, low engagement

A 30-model benchmark bar chart on November 18, 2025, drew wide reach but thin interaction.

What happened

On November 18, 2025, @ArtificialAnlys posted a benchmark bar chart on AA-Omniscence Index, Accuracy, and Hallucination Rate. It was 1 of 4 posts that day, with 3 others on the index and token speeds.

The numbers

291K views, 798 likes, 0.34% engagement, 0.065% save rate, 884 views per day, score 63, #386 of 1,162 AI chart posts, #40 of 491 account posts.

The lesson

Readers saved this 30-model comparison at 0.065% save rate, 0.46x the AI median engagement: a wide but thin chart.

What it means

At #386 of 1,162 AI chart posts, this post's reach ranks #215, but its engagement sits at the 12th percentile, showing a gap between views and interaction.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Data and API

22 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 30%
SeriesGroupValueRead
Claude-3.5 Sonnet11 %estimated
GPT-4o5 %estimated
Gemini-1.5 Pro2 %estimated
Claude-3 Opus-1 %estimated
Claude-3 Sonnet-2 %estimated
GPT-4 Turbo-6 %estimated
Gemini-1.5 Flash-8 %estimated
Llama-3.1 405B-9 %estimated
Mistral Large 2-9 %estimated
Claude-3 Haiku-9 %estimated
GPT-3.5 Turbo-21 %estimated
Llama-3.1 70B-35 %estimated

Showing 12 of 22. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/d1b8386ead25.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/d1b8386ead25.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/d1b8386ead25.skill.md

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id d1b8386ead25.

Approximate values. Our two readings of this chart agreed only in part (confidence 0.30 of 1), so check the original before you quote a number. The API marks it lowConfidence, and ?min_confidence=0.5 leaves it out.

PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/d1b8386ead25Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/d1b8386ead25/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/d1b8386ead25/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/d1b8386ead25/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about Gemini 3

More from Google

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

@ArtificialAnlys published it on Nov 18, 2025 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.