Models
Kimi (Moonshot AI)
Cost per intelligence index by token type

@ArtificialAnlysX · Sep 22, 2026

Cost per intelligence index by token type

@ArtificialAnlys's bar chart drew 5.2K views on X: 0.5x @artificialanlys's median post and #937 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

Muse Glimmer (mini) has the lowest cost, while Claude 5.5 with thinking (max) has the highest.

XData Bar chart Kimi K3 All Kimi (Moonshot AI) modelsMuse Glimmer (mini)GPT-5.2 (mini)Gemini 3.5 Flash (mini)Llama 4.1 (mini)MMPro-V3.5 (mini)GPT-5.6 (mini)GLM-5.2-Flash (mini)DeepSeek V4.1 (mini)

@ArtificialAnlys: Cost per intelligence index by token type — Published by @ArtificialAnlys on X, Sep 22, 2026. Source: x.com

18/ 100

ViralChart score

Quiet

Fewer views and a lower engagement rate than the median post.

#1,080 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #432 of 491 @artificialanlys posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Quiet quadrant, with a score rank of #1,080 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its score of 18 sits at #1,080 of 1,162 AI chart posts, below the median.

Saves land at 0.019%, the 9th percentile among AI chart posts and #1,058 of 1,162.

It was #7 of 9 posts from this account that day, a level launch-day position.

9posts from @artificialanlys that day

Part of a run of 9 posts on Sep 22, 2026. This one was #7 of 9 by views that day.

bottom 9%save rate

0.019% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

0.2xthe median bar chart post

Across 241 bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 25.6K views.

0.5x@artificialanlys's median post

5.2K views, where @artificialanlys's typical post gets 11.4K.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 491 from @artificialanlys.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #1,080 of 1,162

Views	5.2K	#937	bottom 19%
Likes	23	#993	bottom 14%
Engagement rate	0.52%	#803	bottom 31%
Save rate	0.019%	#1,058	bottom 9%

Among 491 @artificialanlys posts

Score #432 of 491

Views	5.2K	#330	bottom 33%
Likes	23	#366	bottom 25%
Engagement rate	0.52%	#372	bottom 24%
Save rate	0.019%	#435	bottom 12%

Growth

One read so far

Views5.2K

Age at our read21 days

Views per day of life248views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

@artificialanlys's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Sep 22, 2026

@ArtificialAnlys charts cost per intelligence index by token type

A 28-model bar chart on cost per intelligence index drew 5.2K views and a 0.52% engagement rate.

What happened

@ArtificialAnlys posted a bar chart on cost per intelligence index by token type on September 22, 2026. It was one of 9 posts from the account that day, alongside 8 others.

The numbers

It reached 5.2K views, ranking #937 of 1,162 AI chart posts against a median of 39.9K. Its score rank is #1,080 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #432 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts.

The lesson

A 28-model bar chart saved at 0.019%, the 9th percentile among AI chart posts, against a median save rate of 0.076%. The chart type and model count did not lift saves above the bottom decile.

What it means

At #432 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts, this chart sits near the bottom of the account's own range. The gap to the 0.076% median save rate is where the shortfall shows.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what @artificialanlys posted next

Data and API

88 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 30%

Series	Group	Value	Read
Answer	Muse Glimmer	0.06 USD	estimated
Answer	GPT-5.1 (high)	0.11 USD	estimated
Answer	Gemini 2.5 (2/3/6) Flash-Lite	0.12 USD	estimated
Answer	Mimi-V2.5-Pro	0.13 USD	estimated
Answer	Liama-4-Scout	0.18 USD	estimated
Answer	GLM-4.5-Air	0.25 USD	estimated
Answer	DeepSeek-V3.2 (no flash)	0.27 USD	estimated
Answer	MiniMax-M2	0.44 USD	estimated
Answer	MiniMax-M3	0.51 USD	estimated
Answer	NanoGPT-9 (mini)	0.58 USD	estimated
Reasoning	NanoGPT-9 (mini)	0.44 USD	estimated
Cache Write	NanoGPT-9 (mini)	0.44 USD	estimated

Showing 12 of 88. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/7082b4bf95a2.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/7082b4bf95a2.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/7082b4bf95a2.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 7082b4bf95a2.

Approximate values. Our two readings of this chart agreed only in part (confidence 0.30 of 1), so check the original before you quote a number. The API marks it lowConfidence, and ?min_confidence=0.5 leaves it out.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/7082b4bf95a2`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/7082b4bf95a2/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/7082b4bf95a2/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/7082b4bf95a2/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about Kimi K3

OfficialX · Kimi (Moonshot AI)Jul 16, 2026

AI Model Benchmarks Comparison357.6K views · 1.4K likes

Data

OfficialBlog · Kimi (Moonshot AI)

AI Model Benchmarks

Data

OfficialBlog · Kimi (Moonshot AI)

AI Model Coding Benchmarks

Data

OfficialBlog · Kimi (Moonshot AI)

BrowseComp Score vs Cost per Task

OfficialBlog · Kimi (Moonshot AI)

BrowseComp Score vs Cost per Task

OfficialBlog · Kimi (Moonshot AI)

AI Model Benchmarks

More from Kimi (Moonshot AI)

Kimi (Moonshot AI) grouped bar chart: AI model benchmark comparison

11x

Kimi (Moonshot AI)·Apr 2026

AI model benchmark comparison

7.6M views17.9K likes0.3% eng.

Data

9.7x

Kimi (Moonshot AI)·Jan 2026

AI model benchmark comparison

7.4M views15.6K likes0.3% eng.

Data

8.6x

Kimi (Moonshot AI)·Jun 2026

AI model benchmark comparison

2.7M views13.9K likes0.6% eng.

Data

Kimi K2.7 Code and Kimi Code: AI Model Benchmark Comparison

OfficialX · Kimi (Moonshot AI)Jul 16, 2026

AI Model Benchmark Comparison25.6M views · 56.9K likes

Data

Kimi K2.7 Code and Kimi Code: Coding Benchmarks Comparison

OfficialX · Kimi (Moonshot AI)Jul 16, 2026

Coding Benchmarks Comparison25.6M views · 56.9K likes

Data

Kimi K2: Kimi K2 Thinking vs GPT-5 vs Claude Sonnet

OfficialX · Kimi (Moonshot AI)Nov 6, 2025

Kimi K2 Thinking vs GPT-5 vs Claude Sonnet4.9M views · 9.5K likes

Data

Kimi K2: Kimi Code Bench Performance vs Tokens

OfficialX · Kimi (Moonshot AI)Jun 12, 2026

Kimi Code Bench Performance vs Tokens2.7M views · 13.9K likes

Data

Kimi agent products and benchmarks: Vision RL Training Curves on Benchmarks

OfficialX · Kimi (Moonshot AI)Jan 30, 2026

Vision RL Training Curves on Benchmarks316.8K views · 1.9K likes

Data

Kimi agent products and benchmarks: Token Efficiency and Usage Before/After Toggle

OfficialX · Kimi (Moonshot AI)Jan 30, 2026

Token Efficiency and Usage Before/After Toggle316.8K views · 1.9K likes

Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

@ArtificialAnlys published it on Sep 22, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.