Models
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs 3.1 Flash-Lite Benchmarks

GoogleX · Jul 21, 2026 · official

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs 3.1 Flash-Lite Benchmarks

Google's bar chart drew 23.6K views on X: 0.3x its median post and #682 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite performance comparison

XData Bar chart Gemini Flash-Lite All Google models3.1 Flash-Lite3.5 Flash-Lite

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs 3.1 Flash-Lite Benchmarks — Published by Google on X, Jul 21, 2026. Source: x.com

28/ 100

ViralChart score

Quiet

Fewer views and a lower engagement rate than the median post.

#936 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #22 of 22 Google posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

It sits in the Quiet quadrant, at #936 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 0.015 views-per-follower sits at the 8th percentile among posts with known followers, against a 0.20 median.

Saves landed at 0.021%, the 10th percentile among AI chart posts and below the 0.076% median.

At 23.6K views it reached 0.32x Google's 73.2K company median, ranking #17 of 22 Google posts.

0.02views per follower

23.6K views from an account with 1.6M followers.

2charts in this one post

The numbers belong to the post, so every chart in it shares them and it is ranked once.

bottom 10%save rate

0.021% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

bottom 11%engagement rate

0.34% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 22 from Google.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #936 of 1,162

Views	23.6K	#682	bottom 41%
Likes	59	#838	bottom 28%
Engagement rate	0.34%	#1,030	bottom 11%
Save rate	0.021%	#1,046	bottom 10%

Among 22 Google posts

Score #22 of 22

Views	23.6K	#17	bottom 25%
Likes	59	#22	bottom 2%
Engagement rate	0.34%	#19	bottom 16%
Save rate	0.021%	#20	bottom 11%

Growth

One read so far

Views23.6K

Age at our read83 days

Views per day of life284views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

Google's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Jul 21, 2026

Google posts Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite benchmark bar chart

The bar chart compares Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite with 3.1 Flash-Lite, and the post landed at #936 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

What happened

Google published a bar chart on July 21, 2026 comparing Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite with 3.1 Flash-Lite. The post carried 2 charts, including Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs 3 Flash Performance, and came the same day as a post on Gemini 3.6 Flash performance across agentic benchmarks.

The numbers

It drew 23.6K views, ranking #682 of 1,162 AI chart posts, against a 39.9K median among AI chart posts. Its score of 28 ranked #936 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #22 of 22 Google posts.

The lesson

A 2-model bar chart with a 0.021% save rate, at the 10th percentile among AI chart posts, is a chart readers did not keep. The 0.076% median among AI chart posts is the gap this format left open.

What it means

At #22 of 22 Google posts and 0.32x the 73.2K company median, this chart sits at the bottom of the publisher's own range. The 23.6K views against the 39.9K median among AI chart posts show the gap is not only internal.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what Google posted next

Data and API

4 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 97%

Series	Group	Value	Read
3.1 Flash-Lite	Agentic terminal-bench coding	31	printed
3.5 Flash-Lite	Agentic terminal-bench coding	54	printed
3.1 Flash-Lite	Knowledge Work	642	printed
3.5 Flash-Lite	Knowledge Work	1140	printed

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/eea45a55658b.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/eea45a55658b.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/eea45a55658b.skill.md

Make one like this Open the post JSON Chart data JSON Skill file API docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id eea45a55658b.

See the Max plan API docs

	Path	Returns	Plan
GET	`/api/v1/charts/eea45a55658b`	Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data link	Open
GET	`/api/v1/charts/eea45a55658b/data`	Every point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSV	Max
GET	`/api/v1/charts/eea45a55658b/render?view=1`	The draw-only view this page uses	Open
POST	`/mcp`	Tool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agents	Max

curlMax

curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/eea45a55658b/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

Claude CodeMax

claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about Gemini Flash-Lite

Gemini Flash-Lite: Agentic token efficiency and accuracy gains

OfficialX · GoogleSep 1, 2026

Agentic token efficiency and accuracy gains26.4K views · 177 likes

Data

Gemini Flash-Lite: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs 3 Flash Performance

OfficialX · GoogleJul 21, 2026

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs 3 Flash Performance23.6K views · 59 likes

Data

OfficialBlog · GoogleJul 21, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash performance across agentic benchmarks

Gemini Flash-Lite: Pareto Frontier: Text Models Cost vs Score

X · @arenaMar 3, 2026

Pareto Frontier: Text Models Cost vs Score50.8K views · 480 likes

Data

More from Google

Google table chart: Gemini 4 Argon benchmark comparison

5.7x

Google·Sep 2026

Gemini 4 Argon benchmark comparison

3.9M views25.9K likes0.8% eng.

Data

Google annotated chart: Alphabet Q2 metrics

2.8x

Google·Jul 2026

Alphabet Q2 metrics

3.9M views12.6K likes0.4% eng.

Data

Google annotated chart: Just posted Q3 earnings. We delivered our first-ever

3.2x

Google·Oct 2025

Just posted Q3 earnings. We delivered our first-ever

2.9M views14.6K likes0.6% eng.

Data

OfficialX · GoogleSep 30, 2026

AI Model Benchmark Comparison9M views · 43K likes

Data

OfficialX · GoogleApr 9, 2026

Model Performance vs Size886.1K views · 1.7K likes

Data

Gemini 3: Codeforces Coding and Algorithms

OfficialX · GoogleFeb 12, 2026

Codeforces Coding and Algorithms695.4K views · 1.9K likes

Data

Gemini 3: Gemini 3 Deep Think on Humanity's Last Exam

OfficialX · GoogleFeb 12, 2026

Gemini 3 Deep Think on Humanity's Last Exam695.4K views · 1.9K likes

Data

Gemini 3: MMMU-Pro Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning

OfficialX · GoogleFeb 12, 2026

MMMU-Pro Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning695.4K views · 1.9K likes

Data

Gemini 3: ARC-AGI-2 Reasoning & Knowledge

OfficialX · GoogleFeb 12, 2026

ARC-AGI-2 Reasoning & Knowledge695.4K views · 1.9K likes

Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

Google published it on Jul 21, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.