1. Models
  2. Google
  3. Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy
A
@ArtificialAnlysX · Nov 17, 2025

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy

@ArtificialAnlys's bar chart drew 48.7K views on X: 4.3x @artificialanlys's median post and #541 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 12, 2026.

Omniscience accuracy across AI models

Published by @ArtificialAnlys on X, Nov 17, 2025. Source: x.com
41/ 100

ViralChart score

Wide but thin

More views than the median post but a lower engagement rate: many saw it, few acted. Common for big accounts.

#742 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #217 of 491 @artificialanlys posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Wide but thin quadrant, with a score rank of #742 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

Its 48.7K views sit 4.3x above the 11.4K median for @ArtificialAnlys posts, ranking #146 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts by views.

Engagement lands at 0.36%, the 14th percentile among AI chart posts and 0.49x the 0.73% median among AI chart posts.

The account posted 4 times that day, and this post ranked #2 of 4 by views among those posts.

4.3x@artificialanlys's median post

48.7K views, where @artificialanlys's typical post gets 11.4K.

bottom 14%engagement rate

0.36% of viewers liked, reposted, quoted or replied. The median post gets 0.73%.

4posts from @artificialanlys that day

Part of a run of 4 posts on Nov 17, 2025. This one was #2 of 4 by views that day.

1.9xthe median bar chart post

Across 241 bar chart posts we hold, the median gets 25.6K views.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 12, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 491 from @artificialanlys.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #742 of 1,162

Views48.7K#541top 47%
Likes152#701bottom 40%
Engagement rate0.36%#998bottom 14%
Save rate0.057%#746bottom 36%

Among 491 @artificialanlys posts

Score #217 of 491

Views48.7K#146top 30%
Likes152#203top 41%
Engagement rate0.36%#442bottom 10%
Save rate0.057%#306bottom 38%

Growth

One read so far

Views48.7K
Age at our read329 days
Views per day of life148views divided by days since it was posted

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

@artificialanlys's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Nov 17, 2025

@ArtificialAnlys posts Omniscience accuracy bar chart

A 27-model bar chart on Omniscience accuracy drew 48.7K views but an engagement rate of 0.36%, below the AI chart median.

What happened

@ArtificialAnlys published a bar chart on Omniscience accuracy across AI models on November 17, 2025. It was one of 4 posts from the account that day, alongside AI Hallucination Rate Comparison, Omniscience Accuracy vs. Omniscience Index, and Artificial Analysis Omniscence Index vs. Total Parameters.

The numbers

The post reached 48.7K views, ranking #541 of 1,162 AI chart posts by views and #146 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts. Its score rank is #742 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

With 27 models shown in a single bar chart, the post drew 48.7K views but an engagement rate of 0.36%, the 14th percentile among AI chart posts. The save rate of 0.057% sits far below the 0.73% median among AI chart posts.

What it means

For @ArtificialAnlys, this post's 48.7K views rank #146 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts, yet its 0.36% engagement rate ranks #998 of 1,162 AI chart posts. The gap between the 4.3x reach ratio and the 0.49x engagement ratio to the AI median shows wide but thin travel.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 12, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Data and API

35 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 72%
SeriesGroupValueRead
Grok 439 %printed
GPT-5.1 (high)39 %printed
Gemini 2.5 Pro37 %printed
Claude 4.1 Opus36 %printed
GPT-5.1 (high)35 %estimated
Claude 4.5 Sonnet31 %printed
DeepSeek R1 052829 %estimated
Kimik2 Thinking29 %printed
DeepSeek Terminus27 %estimated
Gemini 2.5 (high)27 %printed
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp27 %printed
GPT-4.126 %printed

Showing 12 of 35. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/704be8688f51.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/704be8688f51.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/704be8688f51.skill.md

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 704be8688f51.

PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/704be8688f51Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/704be8688f51/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/704be8688f51/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/704be8688f51/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about Gemini 2

More from Google

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

@ArtificialAnlys published it on Nov 17, 2025 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.