1. Models
  2. Kimi (Moonshot AI)
  3. Criterion Pass Rate vs. Material Hallucinations
A
@ArtificialAnlysX · Oct 8, 2026

Criterion Pass Rate vs. Material Hallucinations

@ArtificialAnlys's scatter plot drew 1.1K views on X: 0.1x @artificialanlys's median post and #1,123 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold by views. Read Oct 13, 2026.

Criterion Pass Rate vs. Material Hallucinations per Task

XDataScatter plotKimi K3All Kimi (Moonshot AI) modelsGrok 4.7 (xhigh)GPT-6.1 Sol (max)Mistral Large 4 PreviewMuse Spark 1.3 (max)Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max with fallback)Kimi K2 (max)Claude Opus 5.5 (max with fallback)GLM-5.3 (max)
Published by @ArtificialAnlys on X, Oct 8, 2026. Source: x.com
33/ 100

ViralChart score

Small but loved

Fewer views than the median post but a higher engagement rate: a smaller crowd that acted on it.

#866 of 1,162 AI chart posts we hold · #278 of 491 @artificialanlys posts. Score = views 40%, likes 30%, engagement rate 15%, save rate 15%, each as a percentile of every AI chart post we hold.

Our read

The post sits in the Small but loved quadrant, at #866 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

At 1.1K views, the post sits at 0.10x @ArtificialAnlys's median of 11.4K views.

Its 0.27% save rate lands in the 95th percentile among AI chart posts, against a 0.076% median.

It ranked #10 of 18 posts from this account that day, a level showing against the day's 44.4K top post.

0.1x@artificialanlys's median post

1.1K views, where @artificialanlys's typical post gets 11.4K.

0.1xthe median scatter plot post

Across 187 scatter plot posts we hold, the median gets 22.4K views.

18posts from @artificialanlys that day

Part of a run of 18 posts on Oct 8, 2026. This one was #10 of 18 by views that day.

top 5%save rate

0.266% of viewers bookmarked it to come back to. The median post gets 0.076%.

Public X numbers from our read on Oct 13, 2026. Peers: 1,162 AI chart posts we hold and 491 from @artificialanlys.

Where it sits

Reach against resonance

Each dot is a post. Right is more views, up is a higher engagement rate. The lines are the medians, so the four corners are the four kinds of post.

Among 1,162 AI chart posts we hold

Score #866 of 1,162

Views1.1K#1,123bottom 3%
Likes17#1,049bottom 10%
Engagement rate1.69%#56top 5%
Save rate0.266%#54top 5%

Among 491 @artificialanlys posts

Score #278 of 491

Views1.1K#465bottom 5%
Likes17#408bottom 17%
Engagement rate1.69%#24top 5%
Save rate0.266%#26top 5%

Growth

Our reads cover 26 hours

Views1.1K
Age at our read5 days
Views per day of life228views divided by days since it was posted
Gained between our reads+25views over 26 hours, about 23 a day now

Dots are our reads. The dotted line from the day it was posted to our first read is a gap, not data.

@artificialanlys's posts over time

Every post from this account we hold, by date and views. This one is marked; the line is the running median of the last 10.

News · Oct 8, 2026

@ArtificialAnlys scatter plots criterion pass rate against material hallucinations

A 19-model scatter plot posted October 8, 2026 drew 1.1K views and a 0.27% save rate, the 95th percentile among AI chart posts.

What happened

@ArtificialAnlys posted a scatter plot on October 8, 2026 covering criterion pass rate versus material hallucinations per task. It was one of 18 posts from the account that day, alongside the Artificial Analysis Cyber Index v1 and a hallucination-gated all-pass rate chart.

The numbers

The post reached 1.1K views, ranking #1,123 of 1,162 AI chart posts and #465 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts. Its 0.27% save rate ranked #54 of 1,162 AI chart posts.

The lesson

A 0.27% save rate, the 95th percentile among AI chart posts, shows this scatter plot was kept at a rate far above the 0.076% median. The 1.1K views against a 39.9K median among AI chart posts show the reach did not match the saves.

What it means

At #278 of 491 @ArtificialAnlys posts by score, this post trails the account's own median views of 11.4K by a 0.10x ratio. The 0.27% save rate against a 0.076% median among AI chart posts marks it as a top-decile save performer on low reach.

Written by ViralChart from public numbers read on Oct 13, 2026. Every number is checked against our data before it is shown.

Updates: what @artificialanlys posted next

  1. Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate vs. Cost1.1K views
  2. Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate vs. Output Tokens per Task3.7K views
  3. Artificial Analysis Cyber Index v144.4K views
  4. Artificial Analysis Cyber Index: Score by Benchmark4.4K views
  5. Artificial Analysis Cyber Index: Score vs. Cost per1.9K views
  6. Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite: Quality vs Price3.1K views

Data and API

29 points read off this chart

Estimated from the image 30%
SeriesGroupValueRead
SpaceXAIMost attractive quadrant100 %estimated
MetaMost attractive quadrant100 %estimated
OpenAIMost attractive quadrant100 %estimated
AnthropicMost attractive quadrant100 %estimated
KimiMost attractive quadrant100 %estimated
MistralMost attractive quadrant100 %estimated
DeepSeekMost attractive quadrant100 %estimated
Z AIMost attractive quadrant100 %estimated
GoogleMost attractive quadrant100 %estimated
MiniMaxMost attractive quadrant100 %estimated
Thinking MachinesMost attractive quadrant100 %estimated
GPT-4.7 (xhigh)Most attractive quadrant99 %estimated

Showing 12 of 29. All points, the redraw and the maker

Max plan · API

GET https://viral-chart.com/api/posts/026a224f4a04.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/026a224f4a04.json
GET https://viral-chart.com/api/charts/026a224f4a04.skill.md
Make one like thisOpen the post JSONChart data JSONSkill fileAPI docs

Static files in this prototype. The post JSON holds the public numbers, ranks, score, quadrant, our reads and, when checked, our copy.

API · Max

Use this chart via API

On the Max plan you can pull this chart's numbers with the provenance of each one, as JSON or CSV, with its redraw spec, or call it from an agent over MCP. Chart id 026a224f4a04.

Approximate values. Our two readings of this chart agreed only in part (confidence 0.30 of 1), so check the original before you quote a number. The API marks it lowConfidence, and ?min_confidence=0.5 leaves it out.

See the Max planAPI docs
PathReturnsPlan
GET/api/v1/charts/026a224f4a04Title, publisher, date, form, point count; with a Max key, the data linkOpen
GET/api/v1/charts/026a224f4a04/dataEvery point with its provenance and confidence, plus the redraw spec. Add ?format=csv for CSVMax
GET/api/v1/charts/026a224f4a04/render?view=1The draw-only view this page usesOpen
POST/mcpTool get_chart_data with this id, for Claude, Cursor and other agentsMax
curlMax
curl -s https://viral-chart.com/api/v1/charts/026a224f4a04/data \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"
Claude CodeMax
claude mcp add --transport http viralchart https://viral-chart.com/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer $VIRALCHART_KEY"

60 requests a minute per key; over that you get 429 with Retry-After. Up to 5 keys per account, made on your account page and shown once. Without Max, the data route answers 402 with a link to the plans. The numbers describe a chart its publisher owns, and every file carries a license note.

More charts about Kimi K3

Kimi K3: AI Model Benchmarks Comparison
OfficialX · Kimi (Moonshot AI)Jul 16, 2026
AI Model Benchmarks Comparison357.6K views · 1.4K likes
Data
Kimi K3: AI Model Benchmarks
OfficialBlog · Kimi (Moonshot AI)
AI Model Benchmarks
Data
Kimi K3: AI Model Coding Benchmarks
OfficialBlog · Kimi (Moonshot AI)
AI Model Coding Benchmarks
Data
Kimi K3: BrowseComp Score vs Cost per Task
OfficialBlog · Kimi (Moonshot AI)
BrowseComp Score vs Cost per Task
Kimi K3: BrowseComp Score vs Cost per Task
OfficialBlog · Kimi (Moonshot AI)
BrowseComp Score vs Cost per Task
Kimi K3: AI Model Benchmarks
OfficialBlog · Kimi (Moonshot AI)
AI Model Benchmarks

More from Kimi (Moonshot AI)

Kimi (Moonshot AI) grouped bar chart: AI model benchmark comparison11x
Kimi (Moonshot AI)·Apr 2026
AI model benchmark comparison
7.6M views17.9K likes0.3% eng.
Data
Kimi (Moonshot AI) grouped bar chart: AI model benchmark comparison9.7x
Kimi (Moonshot AI)·Jan 2026
AI model benchmark comparison
7.4M views15.6K likes0.3% eng.
Data
Kimi (Moonshot AI) grouped bar chart: AI model benchmark comparison8.6x
Kimi (Moonshot AI)·Jun 2026
AI model benchmark comparison
2.7M views13.9K likes0.6% eng.
Data
Kimi K2.7 Code and Kimi Code: AI Model Benchmark Comparison
OfficialX · Kimi (Moonshot AI)Jul 16, 2026
AI Model Benchmark Comparison25.6M views · 56.9K likes
Data
Kimi K2.7 Code and Kimi Code: Coding Benchmarks Comparison
OfficialX · Kimi (Moonshot AI)Jul 16, 2026
Coding Benchmarks Comparison25.6M views · 56.9K likes
Data
Kimi K2: Kimi K2 Thinking vs GPT-5 vs Claude Sonnet
OfficialX · Kimi (Moonshot AI)Nov 6, 2025
Kimi K2 Thinking vs GPT-5 vs Claude Sonnet4.9M views · 9.5K likes
Data
Kimi K2: Kimi Code Bench Performance vs Tokens
OfficialX · Kimi (Moonshot AI)Jun 12, 2026
Kimi Code Bench Performance vs Tokens2.7M views · 13.9K likes
Data
Kimi agent products and benchmarks: Vision RL Training Curves on Benchmarks
OfficialX · Kimi (Moonshot AI)Jan 30, 2026
Vision RL Training Curves on Benchmarks316.8K views · 1.9K likes
Data
Kimi agent products and benchmarks: Token Efficiency and Usage Before/After Toggle
OfficialX · Kimi (Moonshot AI)Jan 30, 2026
Token Efficiency and Usage Before/After Toggle316.8K views · 1.9K likes
Data

Questions people ask

Where does this chart come from?

@ArtificialAnlys published it on Oct 8, 2026 on X (x.com). We keep it here, with the publisher and date credited as text, so you can study it without leaving.

Can I make a chart like this?

Use the format, not the picture. Open its data page and use Make one like this: it starts from this chart's numbers and takes yours.